Publication Cover
Policing and Society
An International Journal of Research and Policy
Volume 30, 2020 - Issue 4
2,928
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reporting threats of terrorism: stigmatisation, procedural justice and policing Muslims in Australia

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 361-377 | Received 11 Jul 2018, Accepted 05 Nov 2018, Published online: 25 Nov 2018
 

ABSTRACT

The increase in Islamic-inspired terrorism on Western soil has led governments around the world to introduce new counter-terrorism laws and more intrusive police practices aimed at countering the threat of terrorism. This has had a profound negative impact on Muslim communities living in the West who have expressed feeling stigmatised by institutional responses to terrorism. Such feelings of stigmatisation have implications for Muslims’ willingness to work collaboratively with authorities to counter terrorism. Using survey data collected from 800 Muslims living in Australia, the current study investigates whether Muslims’ perceptions of procedural justice policing can mitigate the effect of feeling stigmatised on their willingness to report terror threats to authorities. We find that both lower levels of stigmatisation and positive perceptions of procedural justice policing are associated with Muslims’ greater willingness to report terrorism threats to police. However, we also find that procedural justice moderates the relationship between feeling stigmatised and reporting intentions. Specifically, procedural justice has a stronger positive effect on reporting intentions for those Muslims who feel more stigmatised. In other words, highly stigmatised Muslims place more salience on procedural justice when deciding whether to report information to police. The implications of these findings for theory and police practice are discussed.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Measuring household income this way enabled us to compare data with Australian Census income categories.

2 It should be noted that we repeated this analysis using a 5-item general procedural justice policing measure in place of the counter-terrorism procedural justice policing measure (e.g., ‘Police treat people with dignity and respect’; ‘Police treat people fairly’, etc; alpha = 0.88; M = 3.93; SD = 0.67). An identical pattern of findings was obtained using this general policing measure. This suggests that if police wish to encourage Muslims to come forward and report terror threats to police, then police should aim to be procedurally just in all types of encounter with Muslim communities, not just in counter-terrorism policing.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Australian Research Council: [Grant Number DP130100392,DP170101149 & FT180100139].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.