In order to meet the goal of user comfort of information displays, visual problems of video display terminal (VDT) work were studied through the analysis of visual functions in two experiments. Eye movement analysis, in Experiment 1, revealed that VDT operators had to move their eyes 2.5 times faster than traditional clerical workers. Lens accommodation, pupil size, and subjective visual comfort were investigated in Experiment 2. A significant correlation was found between the velocity of lens accommodation and the subjective visual comfort while viewing seven different displays (r = .809). A positive‐type cathode‐ray tube (CRT), which has dark characters on a light background, was ascertained to be the most appropriate display type, while working with a liquid crystal display (LCD) was considered to be the least visually comfortable, with the lowest accommodative velocity.
Visual comfort in using different VDT screens
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.