An environmental-justice (equity) grant program was used to make accessible an existing lead-training program to minority persons and residents of low-income communities. The purpose of the program was to enhance the knowledge base within the communities concerning lead hazards and intervention strategies and expand possibilities for employment in the lead abatement industry. Barriers to attendance were anticipated and addressed, and included transportation, meals, license application fees, reminders of course date and location, and day care. The program was evaluated through measures of recruitment rates, pre- and post-testing scores, and change in perception of confidence at pre-test, post-test, and at four-month follow-up. Fee-paying registrants over the same time period were used as a comparison group. First day attendance rates for individuals recruited into the equity-grant was 59 percent, of these 94 percent completed all days. Equity and fee-paying groups had similar scores on the pre-test (p = .209), while mean scores on the final exam differed significantly (p < .001) between the groups and were 77 percent and 85 percent, respectively. After adjusting for demographic and course type attended, perceptions of self-efficacy (benefit) and outcome effectiveness (confidence) increased significantly from preto post-tests for both groups and remained at post-course levels at four months follow-up. Lessons learned include: (1) Lead abatement and other related activities can be successfully taught through traditional training methods; (2) A necessary element for delivery of educational services to minority groups is forming workable ties with local community groups, but eligibility requirements must be maintained; (3) Once barriers to first-day attendance are overcome, the information necessary to perform specific work skills can be taught; (4) Positive changes in belief are not dependent on minority status, income, or education levels; (5) Training and education increased confidence in ability to perform learned skills, and belief that there will be a beneficial outcome when performed for themselves, their families, and communities; and, (6) A consensus regarding applicability of regulations must be achieved among federal, state, and local communities.
Lead Abatement Training for Underserved Populations: Lessons Learned
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.