Analytical Performance of Four Portable Gas Chromatographs Under Field Conditions

Abstract

A field evaluation of the performance of four portable gas chromatographs was conducted at two field sites, one in the Pacific Northwest (chlorinated solvent contamination) and one in the Desert Southwest (primarily jet fuel contamination). The purpose of the study was to compare the performance of four portable GCs under the same conditions. The gas chromatographs had either electron-capture detectors or photoionization detectors. The study evaluated instrument linearity, instrument detection limits, retention time stabilities, response factor stability, and chromatographic performance. Standards and samples contained 1, 1, 2, 2-tetrachloroethane, trichloroethene, tetrachloroethane, 1, 1, 1-trichloroethane, benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene. In order to ensure data comparability, the same model wide-bore column and computing integrator were used with each instrument, where possible. Significant differences in the performance of the four models were detected under the specific conditions used for this study. The results indicate the need to fully characterize the performance of portable instruments before field use so that appropriate quality control measures can be planned and implemented based on the performance of a specific analytical system.