The need for the systemic reform of science and mathematics education in the USA has become a national priority. Politicians, business and the learned societies are demanding change in the performance of US students relative to the best international standards such as those measures by the TIMMS tests. The National Science Foundation is responding to this challenge in providing funding for systemic reform initiatives across many school districts. These reform efforts usually over five years are beginning to show signs of institutionalized change in teacher practice. However the community chorus for enhanced student test scores has resulted in the proliferation of high stakes standardized tests, usually the low-cost pencil and paper variety. These tests have the potential to sidetrack genuine reform efforts in science education such as those contained in the National Science Education Standards (NSES). This paper analyses the congruence and contradictions of this current reform agenda.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.