In this study we investigated how vocabularies of patients, as well as therapists, are related to outcome of psychotherapeutic treatment. For this purpose 80 transcripts of the ten most and ten least improved patients of the Penn Psychotherapy Project (PPP) were included in the Ulm Textbank. In addition to the total amount of speech, different vocabulary measures, such as the “private vocabulary” and the “shared vocabulary” of patient and therapists, were applied to the transcripts. Furthermore, the “Regressive Imagery Dictionary” “RID” was applied as a content analytic approach, measuring primary and secondary process content in a given text. Significant correlations of these variables with the PPP outcome measure “residual gain” were found, indicating, that successful therapists tend to accommodate more to the language of their patients compared with their non-successful colleagues.
Vocabulary Measures for the Evaluation of Therapy Outcome: Re-Studying Transcripts From the Penn Psychotherapy Project
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.