2,021
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Lessening the Load of Misconceptions: Design-Based Principles for Algebra Learning

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
 

Abstract

The current study examined the effectiveness of self-explanation prompts, visual signaling cues, and a combination of the two features on middle school students’ (N = 202) algebra learning. Also explored were the differential effects of features for students with faulty conceptual knowledge (evidenced by a higher prevalence of making errors during problem solving) on learning. That is, we assessed whether students who make prevalent conceptual errors predictive of algebra performance differentially benefit from design features. Participants were randomly assigned to complete 1 of 4 sets of worked example assignments supplemented with self-explanation prompts (n = 51), visual signaling cues (n = 49), both features (n = 51), or neither feature (n = 51). Worked examples supplemented with either self-explanation prompts or signaling cues led to greater learning from pre- to posttest in comparison to the worked example control, with practically meaningful effects. The effect of assignments supplemented with signaling cues was moderated by error prevalence. Those who made errors more frequently demonstrating misunderstanding of algebraic concepts (e.g., the meaning of a coefficient) benefited significantly more from visual signaling cues alone than self-explanation prompts alone or control assignments. These findings highlight the importance of considering differential effects of design features when used in combination or in isolation, particularly for struggling students.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material for this article can be accessed on the publisher's website at https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573428.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by the Institute of Education Sciences and U.S. Department of Education through Grant No. R305A100150 to the Strategic Education Research Partnership. The opinions expressed are our own and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education. Christina A. Barbieri’s continued contribution was supported by Institute of Education Sciences Grant No. R305B130012 to the University of Delaware.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.