![Sample our Communication Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, 2013 & 2014 volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5927/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Information-Science2.jpg"})
Abstract
This study content analyzed the on-screen visuals (i.e., candidate quotes, live Twitter feed, and poll results) displayed during the final presidential debate on the ABC News/Yahoo News live-streaming online coverage. Gatekeeping and research on political campaign coverage were used to provide rationale about the nature of the on-screen visuals. Results largely confirmed previous research into presidential campaign coverage: The on-screen visuals revealed a reliance on elite sources (media-related professionals and public figures), the on-screen visuals were largely neutral in nature for the candidates (although there was a slight pro-Obama advantage in the tweets and a slight pro-Romney advantage in the quoted material shown on-screen), and the on-screen visuals focused on horserace, strategy, and image at the expense of issue and policy discussion.
Notes
See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx1mjT73xYE for a video of the live-streamed coverage that was content analyzed.
For a comprehensive text-list of every on-screen visual, please contact the authors, or you can find all of the on-screen visuals that were content analyzed at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx1mjT73xYE.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Kristen D. Landreville
Kristen D. Landreville is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at the University of Wyoming.
Caitlin White
Caitlin White is a master's student in the Department of Journalism at the University of Memphis.
Sam Allen
Sam Allen is a doctoral student in the Department of Communication at the University of Pittsburgh.