This paper is divided into three sections. The first describes how Perelman's general approach in The New Rhetoric, particularly his emphasis on the role of audience and the epistemological claims he makes for his treatise, cause him to become an uneasy participant in the age old debate between philosophy and rhetoric. Perelman's attempt to resolve this dilemma via the universal audience is described in the second section, which argues for the general failure of this construct to fulfill the role Perelman assigns it. Finally, the third section addresses the implications of this failure for the work as a whole, particularly the question of whether the problematic status of the universal audience invalidates Perelman's claims that The New Rhetoric articulates a truly audience‐based theory of argumentation.
Rhetoric versus philosophy: The role of the universal audience in Chaim Perelman's The New Rhetoric
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.