Use of C-banding for identifying radiation induced micronuclei

Abstract

Differentiation of micronuclei (MN) caused by ionizing radiation from those caused by chemicals is a crucial step for managing treatment of individuals exposed to radiation. MN in binucleated lymphocytes in peripheral blood are widely used as biomarkers for estimating dose of radiation, but they are not specific for ionizing radiation. MN induced by ionizing radiation originate predominantly as a result of chromosome breaks (clastogenic action), whereas MN caused by chemical agents are derived from the loss of entire chromosomes (aneugenic action). C-banding highlights centromeres, which might make it possible to distinguish radiation induced MN, i.e., as a byproduct of acentric fragments, from those caused by the loss of entire chromosomes. To test the use of C-banding for identifying radiation induced MN, a blood sample from a healthy donor was irradiated with 3 Gy of Co-60 gamma rays and cultured. Cells were harvested and dropped onto slides, divided into a group stained directly with Giemsa and another processed for C banding, then stained with Giemsa. The frequency of MN in 500 binucleated cells was scored for each method. In preparations stained with Giemsa directly, the MN appeared as uniformly stained structures, whereas after C banding, some MN exhibited darker regions corresponding to centromeres that indicated that they were not derived from acentric fragments. The C-banding technique enables differentiation of MN from acentric chromosomal material. This distinction is useful for improving the specificity of the MN assay as a biomarker for ionizing radiation.

Key words:

• aneugenic agent
• biodosimetry
• C-banding
• centromeres
• chromosome aberrations
• clastogenic agents
• cytogenetic dosimetry
• dicentrics
• DNA damage
• heterochromatin
• ionizing radiation
• micronuclei
• mutagenicity

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE) for sponsoring this research.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.