277
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Overall Type I Error Rate and Power of Multiple Dunnett's Tests on Rodent Body Weights in Toxicology Studies

, &
Pages 883-900 | Received 23 Mar 2008, Accepted 10 May 2008, Published online: 10 Sep 2008
 

Abstract

Body weight data are routinely collected in in vivo general toxicology studies, including 2-year carcinogenicity studies, to help assess the overall health of animals. The effect of the compound on body weight is statistically evaluated for each sex separately using a linear trend test or a many-to-one test by Dunnett. These tests are performed either in the framework of a one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) or a repeated measures ANOVA. The one-factor ANOVA with Dunnett's test at each time point is a common practice in industry. Although each individual test is conducted at the 0.05 significance level, one wonders about the overall type I error rate and power for performing many individual Dunnett's tests. A simulation study is conducted to answer this question for general toxicology studies of durations 1 month, 3 months, and 2 years. These results provide guidance to managing multiplicity of body weight analysis of general toxicology studies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Dr. Karl Lin for motivating this research project and providing guidance throughout. We also thank Drs. Gerald Long, Robert vanLier, and Alex Dmitrienko for their valuable suggestions that helped improve this manuscript.

Notes

Note 1: Strong correlation refers to 0.97, 0.98, and 0.96 for a 4-week, 13-week, and 2-year study, respectively. Note 2: Based on 1000 simulations. Note 3: ARH(1) stands for heterogeneous first-order autoregressive.

Note 1: Strong correlation refers to 0.97, 0.98, and 0.96 for a 4-week, 13-week, and 2-year study, respectively. Note 2: Based on 1000 simulations. Note 3: ARH(1) stands for heterogeneous first-order autoregressive.

Note 1: Strong correlation refers to 0.97, 0.98 and 0.96 for a 4-week, 13-week, and 2-year study, respectively. Note 2: Based on 1000 simulations.

Note 1: Based on 1000 simulations.

Note 2: 15 animals per group and 4 groups including the control.

Note 1: Based on 1000 simulations. Note 2: 15 animals per group and 4 groups including the control. Note 3: ARH(1) stands for heterogeneous first-order autoregressive.

Note 1: Based on 1000 simulations. Note 2: 10 animals per group and 4 groups including the control. Note 3: ARH(1) stands for heterogeneous first-order autoregressive.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.