This study examines the role of relationship labels as perceptual frames of satisfying communication. Differentiating normative and outcome‐based approaches, it was hypothesized that different relationship labels would be associated with different types of satisfying communication. Naturalistic conversations were interrupted in two geographically distinct samples and interactants assessed relationship intimacy and length, and satisfying communication. Cross‐validated regressions indicated significant associations with satisfaction across samples for intimacy and within each sample for length.
Satisfying communication and relationship labels: Intimacy and length of relationship as perceptual frames of naturalistic conversations
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.