This essay explores rhetorical strategies that construct institutional authority by analyzing discourse from a Senate subcommittee hearing. The analysis reveals three major strategies hearing participants used to reproduce authority relationships: position markers, pseudo‐requests, and images of order. Participants enacted these strategies through several tactics that enabled them constantly to restructure the institution and adapt it to their individual agendas. The essay argues that, although domination is basic to human organization, all structures are vulnerable to strategic alteration through effective participation.
The rhetorical construction of institutional authority in a senate subcommittee hearing on wilderness legislation
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.