A feminist perspective on rhetorical theory: Toward a clarification of boundaries

Abstract

In this essay, Kenneth Burke's rhetorical theory, as an exemplar of a mainstream rhetorical theory, is juxtaposed with that of Starhawk, as an exemplar of a feminist rhetorical theory, to suggest ways in which the patriarchal bias of many rhetorical theories limits our understanding of rhetoric. The essay begins with a formulation of Starhawk's rhetorical theory, which describes a rhetoric of inherent value and a rhetoric of domination. Starhawk's notions of the context for rhetoric, the nature of the rhetor, and the primary rhetorical forms are identified for each rhetorical system. Starhawk's notions then are contrasted with major rhetorical concepts developed by Burke. The essay concludes with suggestions for boundaries that circumscribe the rhetorical theories of both Burke and Starhawk.