ABSTRACT
Constructing mental health interventions comes with specific methodological challenges, especially when working with vulnerable communities. Developing means of assessment for such projects compounds these challenges because the need to protect participant information may conflict with the need to produce persuasive results about the intervention to obtain funding for additional care. This article seeks to redress these methodological challenges by proposing new protocols for approving and assessing mental health interventions centered within multiply marginalized communities.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Peter Cannon
Peter Cannon, PhD, is the Project Manager for the Responsive Librarianship Lab at the University of South Florida’s School of Information where he studies the neurorhetorics of libraries and information science. His current research applies findings from the neurosciences, which suggest reading fiction may improve an individual’s socio-cognitive abilities, to the development of therapeutic library collections. He is also researching how images in graphic novels can help develop or improve socio-cognitive skills.
Katie Lynn Walkup
Katie Lynn Walkup, PhD, is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in Communication for Sociotechnical Systems for the Calhoun Discovery Program at the Virginia Tech Honors College. Her research focuses on technical communication, disability, and mental health stigma.