Publication Cover
Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
An International Journal
Volume 32, 2019 - Issue 2
5,346
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The detrimental effect of academic procrastination on subsequent grades: the mediating role of coping over and above past achievement and working memory capacity

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 141-154 | Received 22 Jun 2018, Accepted 17 Oct 2018, Published online: 08 Nov 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Academic procrastination is common among university students and its effect on their achievement is worrisome. Although procrastination is often depicted as self-regulation failure, research still needs to examine the self-regulatory mechanisms involved in the relationship between procrastination and achievement.

Objectives: In this prospective study, we sought to (a) unravel the unique effect of academic procrastination on university grades, (b) examine the mediating role of task-oriented and disengagement-oriented coping as a self-regulatory pathway toward achievement, (c) control for the potential confounding influence of past achievement and working memory capacity.

Methods: A sample of 258 university students completed self-report measures of academic procrastination and coping, and performed tests of working memory. Their semester grade point average was collected at the end of the semester.

Results: Results of structural equation modeling showed that academic procrastination negatively predicted subsequent academic achievement, even after controlling for high school achievement and working memory capacity. Furthermore, indirect effects revealed that task- and disengagement-oriented coping explained 70% of the total effect.

Conclusion: These findings outline that the effect of academic procrastination cannot be reduced to a history of academic difficulties or limited cognitive ability and that coping plays an important role in the procrastination – achievement relationship.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported scholarships from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) awarded to the first author, second and third author. The manuscript was written while the fourth author was supported by SSHRC grant (#410-2011-1774) and a teaching release award from the Faculty of Social Sciences. We also thank Jean-Luc Daoust at the office of research and institutional planning for his help in preparing the achievement data.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported scholarships from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) awarded to the first author, second and third author. The manuscript was written while the fourth author was supported by SSHRC grant (#410-2011-1774) and a teaching release award from the Faculty of Social Sciences.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.