How do loss- and restoration-oriented coping change across time? A prospective study on adjustment following spousal bereavement

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: According to the Dual Process Model (DPM), shifting between loss-oriented (LO) and restoration-oriented (RO) coping is essential for adjustment following bereavement. Knowledge about how LO and RO coping change over time and how such changes are related to adjustment is missing. With a prospective design this study investigated (1) relations between levels of LO/RO coping and selected outcomes and (2) changes in LO/RO coping across time and their relations to adjustment.

Methods: A sample of 145 spousal bereaved individuals completed questionnaires measuring LO and RO coping, grief symptoms, positive affect, and attachment orientation approximately 2–3 months (baseline) and 7 months (follow-up) post-loss.

Results: High usage of LO coping was associated with poorer outcomes and high usage of RO coping was associated with better outcomes at both baseline and follow-up. Individuals generally shifted towards more RO coping across time and those who exhibited this shift showed lower levels of grief at follow-up compared to individuals who changed towards more LO coping across time.

Conclusions: Individuals showing more RO coping reported better adjustment both early and later in the bereavement process. Changes in coping orientation over time might be useful for understanding complicated grief reactions following loss.

KEYWORDS:

• Adjustment
• bereavement
• coping
• dual process model
• grief
• prospective

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ORCID

Marie Lundorff http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-5750

Dorthe Kirkegaard Thomsen http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5161-6911

Maja O’Connor http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-8633

Notes

1. Results from this study have previously been published (Lundorff, Thomsen, Johannsen, Damkier, & O’Connor, 2019; Thomsen et al., 2018). There is no overlap between the present and past publications concerning main hypotheses and analyses.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Velux Foundation (Velux Fonden) [grant number VELUX33266] awarded to the second author. The second author is affiliated with CON AMORE, which is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation (Danmarks Grundforskningsfond) [DNRF89].