![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Objective: To explore the difference between office and home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women. Methods: We compared the mean of 1 week home BP with office BP, measured by aneroid devices, in 20 normotensive women (68 BP assessments) and 100 women with mild essential chronic hypertension without superimposed gestational hypertension (429 BP assessments). Different approaches were used including the Bland-Altman method to investigate the discrepancies between office and home BP. Results: Systolic office BP in normotensive women (p = 0.004) and diastolic office BP in hypertensive women (p = 0.001) were lower than home BP. The concordance between office and home BPs was better for diastolic BP than for systolic BP. Only a small number of hypertensive women presented home BP ≥135/85 mm Hg. Conclusions: In our study population, the concurrence between office and home BPs is good with the exception of systolic BP in normotensive women. Home blood pressure measurement criteria used in nonpregnant individuals are not adequate in pregnancy.
Notes
12. Association for the advancement of medical instrumentation. Manual, electronic, or automated sphygmomanometers. [ANSI/AAMI SP10:2002 & SP10:2002/A1:2003]. 2030. Arlington, VA, AAMI, 2003. Ref Type: Catalog.
