ABSTRACT
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of 12 weeks of muscle power training (MPT) on casual blood pressure (BP) (before and after each training session) and resting BP (pre- and post-training program) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) elderly.
Methods: Twelve T2DM elderly individuals (68.75 ± 7.83 years), non-insulin-dependents participated in the present study and performed the MPT program twice a week. Casual BP was measured before and after training sessions, and resting BP was measured 48 h before the first and 48 h after the last training session.
Results: Significant decrease in casual systolic (SBP) (−7.08 ± 4.12 mm Hg [effect size [ES]: −1.42 to −0.11]; p < 0.01) and diastolic (DBP) BP (−3.14 ± 1.24 mm Hg [ES: −1.24 to −0.18]; p > 0.01) was found after training sessions, without significant effect (p > 0.05) of the week along time or casual BP × week interaction. No significant change in resting SBP (−5.08 ± 8.93 mm Hg [ES: −0.41]; p = 0.07) and DBP (0.47 ± 6.06 mm Hg [ES: +0.11]; p = 0.79) was found.
Conclusion: MPT was able to reduce casual BP after training sessions. However, there was no significant reduction in resting BP after MPT. Nevertheless, although not statistically significant, there were important clinical reductions in resting SBP in T2DM elderly patients.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for their financial support. The authors are also grateful to UFRGS and all participants of this research and made this project possible. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Authors’ Contributions
C. L. F. M., C. E. B., and R. S. P. designed the study, obtained the funding, researched and analyzed data, wrote the manuscript, contributed to the discussion, reviewed and edited the manuscript; L. O. P. researched and analyzed data and contributed to the discussion; C. M. B. and E. L. C. contributed to the discussion, reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors approve the definitive version of manuscript.
Disclosure of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.