1,409
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

An alternative integral representation for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions

Pages 915-922 | Received 27 Aug 2017, Accepted 25 Sep 2017, Published online: 10 Oct 2017

ABSTRACT

Recently, [Veestraeten D. An integral representation for the product of parabolic cylinder functions. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2017;28(1):15–21] derived an integral representation for Dν(x)Dμ(y) with Re(ν+μ)<1 that was expressed in terms of the Gaussian hypergeometric function. This paper obtains an alternative expression for Dν(x)Dμ(y) in which the integrand contains the parabolic cylinder function itself with the condition for convergence being at Re(ν)<0. The latter property is subsequently used to generate a new integral representation for Dμ(y) in which restrictions on the order μ are absent.

AMS CLASSIFICATION:

1. Introduction

The study of Nicholson-type integrals for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions has a long history. In the 1930s, Meijer [Citation1] and Bailey [Citation2] obtained representations for Dν(ze(1/4)πi)Dν(ze(1/4)πi) and Dν(z)Dν1(z). In 2003, Malyshev [Citation3] derived integral representations for Dν(x)Dν(±x). Later, Glasser [Citation4] and Veestraeten [Citation5] obtained an integral expression for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions with identical orders but unrelated arguments, Dν(x)Dν(y). Subsequently, Nasri [Citation6] derived integral representations for unrelated orders but identical or opposite arguments, Dν(±x)Dν+μ1(x). Recently, Veestraeten [Citation7] used the convolution theorem of the Laplace transform to obtain an integral representation in which both the arguments and the orders are unrelated, i.e. Dν(x)Dμ(y). The integrand in the latter expression contained a Gaussian hypergeometric function or the associated Legendre function of the first kind with the condition for convergence for the orders being at Re(ν+μ)<1. However, that expression did not specialize into any of the aforementioned results in [Citation3–6].

This paper obtains an alternative integral representation for Dν(x)Dμ(y) in which the integrand contains a parabolic cylinder function and for which the condition for convergence for the orders only refers to ν with Re(ν)<0. The paper starts from the Laplace transforms for products of two parabolic cylinder functions that were obtained in [Citation8]. In the latter paper, Laplace transforms were obtained for Dν(x)Dν(y) and Dν(x)Dν1(y) with x and y being real and x+y>0. It was also shown in [Citation8] that the recurrence relation of the parabolic cylinder function allowed to extend these results towards Dν(x)Dνn(y) with n being an integer. The present paper shows that the recursive structure in [Citation8] can also be used to obtain the Laplace transform of Dν(x)Dμ(y) in which the orders of the two parabolic cylinder functions are completely unrelated and where the arguments can also be complex numbers. After obtaining this Laplace transform, the paper proceeds by illustrating that the Laplace transforms for single parabolic cylinder functions in [Citation9] emerge as limiting cases.

The resulting Nicholson-type integral representation for Dν(x)Dμ(y) is first shown to specialize into the aforementioned expressions in [Citation3–6]. As the integral representation for Dν(x)Dμ(y) converges for Re(ν)<0, it can straightforwardly be simplified into a novel integral representation for Dμ(y) in which no restrictions apply to the order μ. Also, the integral representation Dν(x)Dμ(y) can generate expressions for Dν(x) in which the integrand alternatively contains the exponential function, the complementary error function or the modified Bessel function of order 14.

2. A Laplace transform for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions with unrelated orders and arguments

The following Laplace transforms for real arguments x and y with x+y>0, β>0, c0 and Re(s)>0 are taken from Table 1 in [Citation8] Γs+cβD(s+c)/β(x)D(s+c)/β(y)=0exp(st)βexp(ct)(1exp(2βt))1/2expy2x24×exp(y+xexp(βt))22(1exp(2βt))dtΓs+cβD(s+c)/β(x)D1(s+c)/β(y)=0exp(st)βexp(ct)π2expy2x24×erfcy+xexp(βt)2(1exp(2βt))dtΓs+cβD(s+c)/β(x)D2(s+c)/β(y)=0exp(st)βexp(ct)expy2x24×(1exp(2βt))1/2exp(y+xexp(βt))22(1exp(2βt))y+xexp(βt)2(1exp(2βt))(y+xexp(βt))π2erfcy+xexp(βt)2(1exp(2βt))dt, where Γ(z) and erfc(z) denote the gamma function and the complementary error function, respectively. Equations (9.253), (9.254.1) and (9.254.2) in [Citation10] give the following specializations for the parabolic cylinder function D0(z)=expz24,D1(z)=π2expz24erfcz2,D2(z)=expz24zπ2expz24erfcz2. The latter relations allow to express the integrands in the above Laplace transforms in terms of the parabolic cylinder function Γs+cβD(s+c)/β(x)D(s+c)/β(y)=0exp(st)βexp(ct)(1exp(2βt))1/2×exp(x+yexp(βt))24(1exp(2βt))D0y+xexp(βt)1exp(2βt)dtΓs+cβD(s+c)/β(x)D1(s+c)/β(y)=0exp(st)βexp(ct)×exp(x+yexp(βt))24(1exp(2βt))D1y+xexp(βt)1exp(2βt)dtΓs+cβD(s+c)/β(x)D2(s+c)/β(y)=0exp(st)βexp(ct)(1exp(2βt))1/2×exp(x+yexp(βt))24(1exp(2βt))D2y+xexp(βt)1exp(2βt)dt. These relations then can be summarized into the following general expression: Γs+cβD(s+c)/β(x)Dq(s+c)/β(y)=0exp(st)βexp(ct)(1exp(2βt))q/21/2×exp(x+yexp(βt))24(1exp(2βt))Dqy+xexp(βt)1exp(2βt)dt, which also holds for non-integer real values as well as complex values of q. This relation will be rewritten by using the following property of the Laplace transform: f¯(βs)=1βLftβwith β>0, see Equation (29.2.13) in [Citation11], where f¯(s) is the Laplace transform of the original function f(t). Simplifying notation then gives the following Laplace transform in which the arguments may be complex or real: (2.1) Γ(s+c)Dcs(x)Dqs(y)=0exp(st)exp(ct)(1exp(2t))(1/2)(1+c+q)×exp(x+yexp(t))24(1exp(2t))Dq+cy+xexp(t)1exp(2t)dtRe(s+c)>0, Im(x)0, Im(y)0, |arg(x)|<π2, |arg(y)|<π2,|arg(x)+arg(y)|<π2 or Re(s+c)>0, Im(x)=Im(y)=0, x+y>0 orπ2Re(s+c)>0, Re(c+q)<1, Im(x)=Im(y)=0, x+y=0.(2.1) The Laplace transform (Equation2.1) can be specialized into the four expressions for single parabolic cylinder functions in [Citation9] in which the Laplace parameter figured in the order. Hereto, the following expression for the parabolic cylinder function with zero argument will be used: Dν(0)=2ν/2πΓ(1ν2), see [Citation12]. Also, the recurrence and duplication properties of the gamma function are to be used Γ(1+z)=zΓ(z),Γ(2z)=(2π)1/222z1/2Γ(z)Γ(z+12), see Equations (6.1.15) and (6.1.18) in [Citation11]. Plugging x=0 into the Laplace transform (Equation2.1) and simplifying gives (2) 2sΓ(s+c)Dq2s(y)=0exp(st)2cexp(ct)(1exp(t))(1/2)(1+2c+q)×expy24(1exp(t))Dq+2cy1exp(t)dtRe(s+c)>0, Im(y)0, |arg(y)|<π4 or Re(s+c)>0, Im(y)=0, y>0.(2) Equation (Equation2.2) corresponds with the Laplace transform (3.11.6.1) in [Citation9] and its specializations in Equations (3.11.6.2) and (3.11.6.3).

Evaluating the limit of the transform (Equation2.1) for y=0 yields (2.3) 2sΓ(2sc)Γ(s+q)Dc2s(x)=0exp(st)2q3/2πexpc2t(1exp(t))q+c/21×expx24(1exp(t))D12qcxexp(t)1dtRe(2sc)>0, Im(x)0, |arg(x)|<π4 or Re(2sc)>0, Im(x)=0, x>0,(2.3) which corresponds with the Laplace transform (3.11.6.4) in [Citation9].

3. Integral representations of (products of) parabolic cylinder functions

Plugging ν=cs and μ=qs in the Laplace transform (Equation2.1) gives (3.1) Dν(x)Dμ(y)=1Γ(ν)0exp(νt)(1exp(2t))(1/2)(1ν+μ)×exp(x+yexp(t))24(1exp(2t))Dμνy+xexp(t)1exp(2t)dtRe(ν)<0, Im(x)0, Im(y)0, |arg(x)|<π2, |arg(y)|<π2,|arg(x)+arg(y)|<π2 or Re(ν)<0, Im(x)=Im(y)=0, x+y>0 orπ2Re(ν)<0,Re(μν)<1, Im(x)=Im(y)=0, x+y=0.(3.1) Note that the integrand in the integral representation (Equation3.1) contains the parabolic cylinder function, whereas the representation for Dν(x)Dμ(y) in Equation (3.1) in [Citation7] was expressed in terms of the Gaussian hypergeometric function or the associated Legendre function of the first kind. The restrictions on x and y in both expressions are identical but the representations differ considerably in terms of the condition for convergence for the orders, namely Re(ν+μ)<1 in [Citation7] versus Re(ν)<0 in Equation (Equation3.1). This property of integral representation (Equation3.1) has interesting consequences as will be noted below.

The integral representation (Equation3.1) specializes into the expressions there were obtained in [Citation3–6]. Setting μ=ν in Equation (Equation3.1) gives (3.2) Dν(x)Dν(y)=1Γ(ν)expy2x240exp(νt)1exp(2t)×exp(y+xexp(t))22(1exp(2t))dtRe(ν)<0, Im(x)0, Im(y)0, |arg(x)|<π2, |arg(y)|<π2,|arg(x)+arg(y)|<π2 or Re(ν)<0, Im(x)=Im(y)=0, x+y0.(3.2) This expression is equivalent to Equation (2.1) in [Citation5] that subsequently was shown to also yield the expressions for Dν(x)Dν(±x) and Dν(x)Dν(y) in [Citation3,Citation4], respectively. Setting y=x in the integral representation (Equation3.1), using the substitution u=12t and employing the identities sinh(2u)=(1exp(4u))/2exp(2u) and coth(u)=(1+exp(2u))/(1exp(2u)) gives (3.3.) Dν(x)Dμ(x)=2(1/2)(1+νμ)1Γ(ν)0exp(1+ν+μ)ux24coth(u)×Dμν(xcoth(u))sinh(2u)(1/2)(νμ1)duRe(ν)<0, Re(μ2ν)<0, Im(x)0, |arg(x)|<π4 or π4Re(ν)<0, Re(μ2ν)<0, Im(x)=0, x>0,(3.3.) which corresponds with Equation (2.36) in [Citation6].

The integral representation (Equation3.1) can be used to generate a wide variety of novel integral representations for single parabolic cylinder functions by using x=0, y=0, ν=0, μ=1, etc. For instance, plugging ν=1 into Equation (Equation3.1), setting x at 0 and using erfc(0)=1 (see Equations (8.250.1) and (8.250.4) in [Citation10]) gives (3.4) Dμ(y)=2π0exp(t)(1exp(2t))(1/2)(2+w)expy2exp(2t)4(1exp(2t))×Dμ+1y1exp(2t)dtIm(y)0, |arg(y)|<π4 or Im(y)=0, y>0.(3.4) Note that this new integral representation for Dμ(y) has the property of converging for all values of the order μ.

Equation (Equation3.1) can also be used to generate integral representations for single parabolic cylinder functions in which the integrand is simplified into the limiting functions of the parabolic cylinder function. Using y=0 in Equation (Equation3.1) gives (3.5) Dν(x)=Γ(1μ2)πΓ(ν)2μ/20exp(νt)(1exp(2t))(1/2)(1ν+μ)×expx24(1exp(2t))Dμνxexp(t)1exp(2t)dtRe(ν)<0, Im(x)0, |arg(x)|<π4 or Re(ν)<0, Im(x)=0, x>0.(3.5) The integrand in Equation (Equation3.5) can be expressed in terms of the exponential function by choosing μ=ν and μ=ν+1, whereas choosing μ=ν1 gives the complementary error function, see Equations (9.253) and (9.254.1) in [Citation10]. The modified Bessel function of order 14, K1/4(z), emerges for μ=ν12 given D1/2(z)=z/2πK1/4(14z2), see [Citation12]. Using these relations gives (3.6) Dν(x)=21+ν/2Γ(ν2)0exp(νt)(1exp(2t))1/2×expx2(1+exp(2t))4(1exp(2t))dtRe(ν)<0, Im(x)0, |arg(x)|<π4 or Re(ν)<0, Im(x)=0, x>0,(3.6) (3.7) Dν(x)=x2(1+ν)/2Γ(1ν2)0exp((ν1)t)(1exp(2t))3/2×expx2(1+exp(2t))4(1exp(2t))dtRe(ν)<1, Im(x)0, |arg(x)|<π4 or Re(ν)<1, Im(x)=0, x>0,(3.7) (3.8) Dν(x)=ν2ν/2πexpx24Γ(1ν2)0exp(νt)erfcxexp(t)2(1exp(2t))dtRe(ν)<0, Im(x)0, |arg(x)|<π4 or Re(ν)<0, Im(x)=0, x>0(3.8) (3.9) Dν(x)=xΓ34ν22ν/21/4πΓ(ν)0expν12t(1exp(2t))1/2×expx24(1exp(2t))K1/4x2exp(2t)4(1exp(2t))dtRe(ν)<0, Im(x)0, |arg(x)|<π4 or Re(ν)<0, Im(x)=0, x>0.(3.9) Alternative expressions in which these integrands emerge can be obtained from Equation (Equation3.1) by setting x=0 and subsequently varying ν.

Acknowledgements

The author desires to express his gratitude to the reviewer for pointing out inconsistencies in a previous draft.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

References

  • Meijer CS. Einige Integraldarstellungen für Produkte von Whittakerschen Funktionen. Q J Math. 1935;6(24):241–248. doi: 10.1093/qmath/os-6.1.241
  • Bailey WN. An integral representation for the product of two Whittaker functions. Q J Math. 1937;8(29):51–53. doi: 10.1093/qmath/os-8.1.51
  • Malyshev C. A Nicholson–type integral for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions Dν(x)Dν(−x) at ℜν<0. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2003;14(2):139–148. doi: 10.1080/1065246031000074371
  • Glasser ML. An integral representation for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions having unrelated arguments. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2015;26(10):825–828. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2015.1053086
  • Veestraeten D. Some integral representations and limits for (products of) the parabolic cylinder function. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2016;27(1):64–77. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2015.1092441
  • Nasri R. Product of parabolic cylinder functions involving Laplace transforms of confluent hypergeometric functions. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2016;27(3):181–196. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2015.1110700
  • Veestraeten D. An integral representation for the product of parabolic cylinder functions. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2017;28(1):15–21. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2016.1247837
  • Veestraeten D. On the inverse transform of Laplace transforms that contain (products of) the parabolic cylinder function. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2015;26(11):859–871. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2015.1063628
  • Prudnikov AP, Brychkov YuA, Marichev OI. Integrals and series. Inverse Laplace transforms. Vol. 5. New York: Gordon and Breach; 1992.
  • Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM. Table of integrals, series, and products. 8th ed. In: Zwillinger D, Moll V, editors. New York (NY): Academic Press; 2014.
  • Abramowitz M, Stegun IA. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. New York: Dover Publications; 1972.
  • Magnus W, Oberhettinger F, Soni RP. Formulas and theorems for the special functions of mathematical physics. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 1966.