ABSTRACT
Recently, [Veestraeten D. An integral representation for the product of parabolic cylinder functions. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2017;28(1):15–21] derived an integral representation for with that was expressed in terms of the Gaussian hypergeometric function. This paper obtains an alternative expression for in which the integrand contains the parabolic cylinder function itself with the condition for convergence being at . The latter property is subsequently used to generate a new integral representation for in which restrictions on the order μ are absent.
1. Introduction
The study of Nicholson-type integrals for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions has a long history. In the 1930s, Meijer [Citation1] and Bailey [Citation2] obtained representations for and . In 2003, Malyshev [Citation3] derived integral representations for . Later, Glasser [Citation4] and Veestraeten [Citation5] obtained an integral expression for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions with identical orders but unrelated arguments, . Subsequently, Nasri [Citation6] derived integral representations for unrelated orders but identical or opposite arguments, . Recently, Veestraeten [Citation7] used the convolution theorem of the Laplace transform to obtain an integral representation in which both the arguments and the orders are unrelated, i.e. . The integrand in the latter expression contained a Gaussian hypergeometric function or the associated Legendre function of the first kind with the condition for convergence for the orders being at . However, that expression did not specialize into any of the aforementioned results in [Citation3–6].
This paper obtains an alternative integral representation for in which the integrand contains a parabolic cylinder function and for which the condition for convergence for the orders only refers to ν with . The paper starts from the Laplace transforms for products of two parabolic cylinder functions that were obtained in [Citation8]. In the latter paper, Laplace transforms were obtained for and with x and y being real and x+y>0. It was also shown in [Citation8] that the recurrence relation of the parabolic cylinder function allowed to extend these results towards with n being an integer. The present paper shows that the recursive structure in [Citation8] can also be used to obtain the Laplace transform of in which the orders of the two parabolic cylinder functions are completely unrelated and where the arguments can also be complex numbers. After obtaining this Laplace transform, the paper proceeds by illustrating that the Laplace transforms for single parabolic cylinder functions in [Citation9] emerge as limiting cases.
The resulting Nicholson-type integral representation for is first shown to specialize into the aforementioned expressions in [Citation3–6]. As the integral representation for converges for , it can straightforwardly be simplified into a novel integral representation for in which no restrictions apply to the order μ. Also, the integral representation can generate expressions for in which the integrand alternatively contains the exponential function, the complementary error function or the modified Bessel function of order .
2. A Laplace transform for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions with unrelated orders and arguments
The following Laplace transforms for real arguments x and y with x+y>0, and are taken from Table 1 in [Citation8] where and erfc denote the gamma function and the complementary error function, respectively. Equations (9.253), (9.254.1) and (9.254.2) in [Citation10] give the following specializations for the parabolic cylinder function The latter relations allow to express the integrands in the above Laplace transforms in terms of the parabolic cylinder function These relations then can be summarized into the following general expression: which also holds for non-integer real values as well as complex values of q. This relation will be rewritten by using the following property of the Laplace transform: see Equation (29.2.13) in [Citation11], where is the Laplace transform of the original function . Simplifying notation then gives the following Laplace transform in which the arguments may be complex or real: (2.1) (2.1) The Laplace transform (Equation2.1(2.1) (2.1) ) can be specialized into the four expressions for single parabolic cylinder functions in [Citation9] in which the Laplace parameter figured in the order. Hereto, the following expression for the parabolic cylinder function with zero argument will be used: see [Citation12]. Also, the recurrence and duplication properties of the gamma function are to be used see Equations (6.1.15) and (6.1.18) in [Citation11]. Plugging x=0 into the Laplace transform (Equation2.1(2.1) (2.1) ) and simplifying gives (2) (2) Equation (Equation2.2(2) (2) ) corresponds with the Laplace transform (3.11.6.1) in [Citation9] and its specializations in Equations (3.11.6.2) and (3.11.6.3).
Evaluating the limit of the transform (Equation2.1(2.1) (2.1) ) for y=0 yields (2.3) (2.3) which corresponds with the Laplace transform (3.11.6.4) in [Citation9].
3. Integral representations of (products of) parabolic cylinder functions
Plugging and in the Laplace transform (Equation2.1(2.1) (2.1) ) gives (3.1) (3.1) Note that the integrand in the integral representation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ) contains the parabolic cylinder function, whereas the representation for in Equation (3.1) in [Citation7] was expressed in terms of the Gaussian hypergeometric function or the associated Legendre function of the first kind. The restrictions on x and y in both expressions are identical but the representations differ considerably in terms of the condition for convergence for the orders, namely in [Citation7] versus in Equation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ). This property of integral representation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ) has interesting consequences as will be noted below.
The integral representation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ) specializes into the expressions there were obtained in [Citation3–6]. Setting in Equation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ) gives (3.2) (3.2) This expression is equivalent to Equation (2.1) in [Citation5] that subsequently was shown to also yield the expressions for and in [Citation3,Citation4], respectively. Setting y=x in the integral representation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ), using the substitution and employing the identities and gives (3.3.) (3.3.) which corresponds with Equation (2.36) in [Citation6].
The integral representation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ) can be used to generate a wide variety of novel integral representations for single parabolic cylinder functions by using etc. For instance, plugging into Equation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ), setting x at 0 and using erfc (see Equations (8.250.1) and (8.250.4) in [Citation10]) gives (3.4) (3.4) Note that this new integral representation for has the property of converging for all values of the order μ.
Equation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ) can also be used to generate integral representations for single parabolic cylinder functions in which the integrand is simplified into the limiting functions of the parabolic cylinder function. Using y=0 in Equation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ) gives (3.5) (3.5) The integrand in Equation (Equation3.5(3.5) (3.5) ) can be expressed in terms of the exponential function by choosing and , whereas choosing gives the complementary error function, see Equations (9.253) and (9.254.1) in [Citation10]. The modified Bessel function of order , , emerges for given , see [Citation12]. Using these relations gives (3.6) (3.6) (3.7) (3.7) (3.8) (3.8) (3.9) (3.9) Alternative expressions in which these integrands emerge can be obtained from Equation (Equation3.1(3.1) (3.1) ) by setting x=0 and subsequently varying ν.
Acknowledgements
The author desires to express his gratitude to the reviewer for pointing out inconsistencies in a previous draft.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
References
- Meijer CS. Einige Integraldarstellungen für Produkte von Whittakerschen Funktionen. Q J Math. 1935;6(24):241–248. doi: 10.1093/qmath/os-6.1.241
- Bailey WN. An integral representation for the product of two Whittaker functions. Q J Math. 1937;8(29):51–53. doi: 10.1093/qmath/os-8.1.51
- Malyshev C. A Nicholson–type integral for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions Dν(x)Dν(−x) at ℜν<0. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2003;14(2):139–148. doi: 10.1080/1065246031000074371
- Glasser ML. An integral representation for the product of two parabolic cylinder functions having unrelated arguments. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2015;26(10):825–828. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2015.1053086
- Veestraeten D. Some integral representations and limits for (products of) the parabolic cylinder function. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2016;27(1):64–77. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2015.1092441
- Nasri R. Product of parabolic cylinder functions involving Laplace transforms of confluent hypergeometric functions. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2016;27(3):181–196. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2015.1110700
- Veestraeten D. An integral representation for the product of parabolic cylinder functions. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2017;28(1):15–21. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2016.1247837
- Veestraeten D. On the inverse transform of Laplace transforms that contain (products of) the parabolic cylinder function. Integral Transforms Spec Funct. 2015;26(11):859–871. doi: 10.1080/10652469.2015.1063628
- Prudnikov AP, Brychkov YuA, Marichev OI. Integrals and series. Inverse Laplace transforms. Vol. 5. New York: Gordon and Breach; 1992.
- Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM. Table of integrals, series, and products. 8th ed. In: Zwillinger D, Moll V, editors. New York (NY): Academic Press; 2014.
- Abramowitz M, Stegun IA. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. New York: Dover Publications; 1972.
- Magnus W, Oberhettinger F, Soni RP. Formulas and theorems for the special functions of mathematical physics. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 1966.