139
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Responsiveness to a Prospective Student E-Mail Inquiry by Community Colleges in the Nine Mega-States

 

Abstract

This quantitative study investigated e-mail responsiveness by community colleges in the nine mega-states to an inquiry from a prospective student. Noel-Levitz (Citation2006b) reported that prospective students want to receive an e-mail with information about an institution prior to applying for admission. Specifically, high school juniors and seniors want to have a two-way conversation with an institutional representative during their college search (Noel-Levitz, Citation2006a, Citation2007a, Citation2007b, Citation2008). Research also indicates that community colleges are not as likely as four-year institutions to use web-based communication with prospective students (Noel-Levitz, Citation2008; Peakow, Citation2006). Half of the community colleges in this study replied to an e-mail inquiry from a prospective student within five business days, just over 30% of community colleges responded with individualized responses, and a number of institutions utilized automated software that did not address the prospective student's questions. Community colleges must acknowledge and respond to the wants and needs of their prospective students for two-way communication during the college search process. With the dramatic expansion of web-based communications options, community colleges that routinely ignore prospective student e-mail inquiries risk a negative backlash from a variety of directions. Numerous student complaints about an institution's lack of responsiveness could trigger any number of local- and state-level concerns impacting everything from simple image and reputation to questions about administrative priorities and the appropriateness of funding levels.

Notes

Note. Carnegie classification descriptions reflect fall enrollment data and show FTE degree-seeking student enrollments for degree granting institutions: VS2—Very small two-year, fewer than 500; S2—Small two-year, enrollment of 500–1,999; M2—Medium two-year, enrollment of 2,000–4,999; L2—Large two-year, enrollment of 5,000–9,999; VL2—Very large two-year, at least 10,000; VS4/NR—Very small four-year, primarily nonresidential, fewer than 1,000; S4/NR—Small four-year, primarily nonresidential, 1,000–2,999; M4/NR—Medium four-year, primarily nonresidential, 3,000–9,999; L4/NR—Large four-year, primarily nonresidential, at least 10,000 (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, n. d., Classification Description).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.