471
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Market Reactions and Corporate Philanthropy: a case study of the Wenchuan earthquake in China

Pages 299-315 | Published online: 07 Feb 2012
 

Abstract

This paper studies the market reactions to corporate philanthropic giving in response to the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, China. Based on a sample of 136 Chinese listed companies, our results indicate a significant and positive seven-day cumulative abnormal rise in the share prices of those companies making donations compared to those not making donations. Both timeliness and the amount of philanthropic giving generate significant market reactions, confirming Godfrey's assertion that corporate philanthropy can be perceived as a genuine manifestation of firms' underlying desire to raise their market values. However, when the sample firms are divided into two groups, government controlled and non-government controlled, Godfrey's assertion is challenged by our empirical results which show different market responses to the two different types of companies.

Notes

*Lin Song is associate professor of economics in the School of Economics and Finance at Xi'an Jiaotong University; Jianling Wang is lecturer in the School of Management at Xi'an Jiaotong University; Shujie Yao is professor of economics and head of the School of Contemporary Chinese Studies at the University of Nottingham and special professor of economics at Xi'an Jiaotong University; and Jian Chen is lecturer in the School of Contemporary Chinese Studies at the University of Nottingham. This research is supported by the ‘Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities’ of China (Project Number: 2010jdhz03). The authors are grateful for valuable comments by participants at the 2nd Conference of the International Forum for Contemporary Chinese Studies held in September 2009 at the University of Nottingham. The authors are also grateful for the valuable comments of one anonymous referee and the editor, Professor Shuisheng Zhao, but remain solely responsible for any errors or omissions herein. The authors can be reached by email at [email protected]

 1. D. H. Saiia, ‘Corporate citizenship and corporate philanthropy: strategic philanthropy is good corporate citizenship’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 2, (2001), pp. 1–19.

 2. A. B. Carroll, ‘Corporate social performance measurement: a commentary on methods for evaluating an elusive construct’, Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 12, (1991), pp. 385–401.

 3. B. R. Bartkus, S. A. Morris and B. Seifert, ‘Governance and corporate philanthropy’, Business and Society 41, (2002), pp. 319–344.

 4. D. F. Burlingame and P. A. Frishkoff, ‘How does firm size affect corporate philanthropy?’, in D. F. Burlingame and D. R. Young, eds, Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996), pp. 86–104.

 5. A. Buchholtz, A. C. Amason and M. Rutherford, ‘Beyond resources: the mediating effect of management discretion and values on corporate philanthropy’, Business and Society 2, (1999), pp. 167–187; J. D. Werbel and M. S. Wortman, ‘Strategic philanthropy: responding to the negative portrayals of social responsibility’, Corporate Reputation Review 3, (2000), pp. 124–136.

 6. R. E. Wokutch and B. A. Spencer, ‘Corporate saint and sinners: the effects of philanthropic and illegal activity on organizational performance’, California Management Review 2, (1987), pp. 62–77; D. H. Saiia, A. B. Carroll and A. K. Buchholtz, ‘Philanthropy as strategy’, Business and Society 42, (2003), pp. 169–201.

 7. P. C. Godfrey, ‘The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective’, Academy of Management Review 4, (2005), pp. 777–798; N. A. Gardberg and C. J. Fombrun, ‘Corporate citizenship: creating intangible assets across institutional environments’, Academy of Management Review 31(2), (2006), pp. 329–346.

 8. China Securities Regulatory Commission, China Capital Markets Development Report (2008) (China Financial Publishing House, 2008), p. 50.

10. See http://www.rbc.cn, (5 September 2008).

11. See http://www.163.com, (12 August 2009).

13. J. C. Anderson and A. W. Frankle, ‘Voluntary social reporting: an Iso-Beta portfolio analysis’, The Accounting Review 3, (1980), pp. 467–479.

14. Saiia et al., ‘Philanthropy as strategy’.

15. P. Navarro, ‘Why do corporations give to charity?’, Journal of Business 1, (1988), pp. 65–93.

16. C. J. Fombrun, Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996).

17. W. Brown, E. Helland and J. K. Smith, ‘Corporate philanthropic practices’, Journal of Corporate Finance 5, (2006), pp. 855–877.

18. Gardberg and Fombrun, ‘Corporate citizenship’.

19. W. T. Harbaugh, ‘What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow’, Journal of Public Economics 2, (1998), pp. 269–284.

20. C. Smith, ‘The new corporate philanthropy’, Harvard Business Review 3, (1994), pp. 105–116.

21. M. Strahilevitz and J. G. Myers, ‘Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell’, Journal of Consumer Research 3, (1998), pp. 434–446; M. Strahilevitz, ‘The effects of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a charity-linked brand’, Journal of Consumer Psychology 8(3), (1999), pp. 215–241.

22. L. Campbell, C. S. Gulas and T. S. Gruca, ‘Corporate giving behavior and decision-maker social consciousness’, Journal of Business Ethics 19(4), (1999), pp. 375–383.

23. Godfrey, ‘The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth’.

24. Godfrey, ‘The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth’

25. D. M. Patten, ‘Does the market value corporate philanthropy? Evidence from the response to the 2004 tsunami relief effort’, Journal of Business Ethics 81, (2008), pp. 599–607.

26. A. Mohd Ghazali Nazli, ‘Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: some Malaysian evidence’, Corporate Governance 3, (2007), pp. 251–266.

27. L. E. Preston, and D. P. O'Bannon, ‘The corporate social financial-performance relationship: a typology and analysis’, Business and Society 36, (1997), pp. 419–429.

28. D. M. Patten, ‘Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10, (1991), pp. 297–308.

29. See http://www.gov.cn, (30 July 2009).

30. R. Cooter and B. Broughman, ‘Charity, publicity, and the donation registry’, The Economists' Voice 3, (2005), pp. 1–8.

31. See http://www.cyol.net, (12 August 2009).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.