Abstract
Similarities and differences in the articles by Rumsey, Garfield and Chance are summarized. An alternative perspective on the distinction between statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking is presented. Based on this perspective, an example is provided to illustrate how literacy, reasoning and thinking can be promoted within a single topic of instruction. Additional examples of assessment items based on the perspective are offered. The author concludes with implications for statistics education research that stem from the incorporation of recommendations made by Rumsey, Garfield and Chance into classroom practice.
Notes
This article is based on comments made by the author as discussant of a symposium presented at the 2000 Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association in New Orleans.