This paper builds on some of the critical points made in the final section of Leigh Binford's discussion. David Stoll's critique of Rigoberta Menchú Tum is not simply an attack on the truthfulness of an indigenous woman who has become a major political figure. Stoll's larger agenda is an assault, not only on a number of other anthropologists, but on accounts of Latin American history that honor grassroots strivings for rights and social justice, and on political arguments offered by cultural studies and post‐colonial criticism. His book resonates with parallel attacks from other, and diverse, quarters, while also embodying a range of vices as an anthropological analysis (Stoll 1999).
Deromanticizing subalterns or recolonializing anthropology? Denial of indigenous agency and reproduction of northern hegemony in the work of david stoll
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.