A critique of integration

Abstract

The term ‘integration’ is a category used both in political discourse and in sociological analysis. In political discourse, in the public debate, it has become a magic word which accompanies repression when a political power is unable to deal with major difficulties, particularly in poor neighbourhoods. The so-called ‘models of integration’ are all failing, whether in the United Kingdom after the terrorist attacks of 2005, in the Netherlands after the murder of Theo Van Gogh and Pim Fortuyn, or in France after the riots of 2005. In political and social life, integration is far from able to account for realities or to implement public policies successfully. From a sociological perspective, integration is connected with approaches which are centred on society or the social system, much more than with those that deal with the subjectivity of individuals and their capacity for personal or collective action. This means that integration belongs much more to traditional sociological thinking than to the new contemporary sociological imagination.

Keywords:

• integration
• identities
• diversity
• migration
• cultural differences
• multiculturalism

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Michel Wieviorka

MICHEL WIEVIORKA is Research Professor at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) and Administrator of the Fondation de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme (FMSH) in Paris.