How does change occur in psychotherapy? Innovative moments predict stronger therapeutic alliance and functional improvement in a psychodynamic case study

Abstract

Innovative moments (IMs) in psychotherapy contradict or challenge clients’ maladaptive patterns of meaning associated with their suffering. IMs are receiving increased theoretical and empirical attention in psychotherapy research and are associated with symptomatic improvement. However, little is known about possible predictors of IMs and their impact beyond their association with outcomes. A therapeutic alliance (TA) that implies a collaborative bond between clients and therapists might set the stage for the occurrence of IMs. Additionally, the occurrence of IMs could serve as a relational experience within the session that strengthens the TA. Thus, in the present study, we examined the association over time between IMs and (i) TA, and (ii) functioning, in a time-limited case study with a good outcome. Furthermore, this study is one of the first to explore IMs in psychodynamic therapy (PDT). Transcriptions of ten randomly selected sessions of PDT of a 43-year-old male with dysthymia were coded using the innovative moment coding system. Self-report measures of function and TA were collected at each session. Data were analyzed using simulation modeling analysis. Consistent with good-outcome cases in other therapeutic approaches, high-level IMs (H-IMs) increased while low-level IMs (L-IMs) decreased throughout treatment. H-IMs predicted a change in functioning in the following session. Finally, H-IMs were associated with higher TA post-session, and specifically with agreement on treatment tasks. To conclude, moments of change in the client’s pattern of meaning are related to stronger TA and better treatment outcome. If replicated, these findings may provide important insights regarding the unfolding of therapeutic change.

Keywords:

• Innovative moments in psychotherapy
• therapeutic alliance
• functional improvement
• psychodynamic therapy

Author contributions

Leeav Sheena, Department of Psychology, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel; Yogev Kivity, Department of Psychology, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sharon Shimshi, Department of Psychology, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel; Rivka Tuval-Mashiach, Department of Psychology, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tuvia Peri, Department of Psychology, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel; All authors report no conflicting interests.