500
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Verification testing to confirm VO2max attainment in persons with spinal cord injury

, , , , , , , , , & show all
 

Abstract

Context/Objective:

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is a widely used measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, aerobic function, and overall health risk. Although VO2max has been measured for almost 100 yr, no standardized criteria exist to verify VO2max attainment. Studies document that incidence of ‘true’ VO2max obtained from incremental exercise (INC) can be confirmed using a subsequent verification test (VER). In this study, we examined efficacy of VER in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design:

Repeated measures, within-subjects study.

Setting:

University laboratory in San Diego, CA.

Participants:

Ten individuals (age and injury duration = 33.3 ± 10.5 yr and 6.8 ± 6.2 yr) with SCI and 10 able-bodied (AB) individuals (age = 24.1 ± 7.4 yr).

Interventions:

Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was determined during INC on an arm ergometer followed by VER at 105 percent of peak power output (% PPO).

Outcome Measures:

Gas exchange data, heart rate (HR), and blood lactate concentration (BLa) were measured during exercise.

Results:

Across all participants, VO2peak was highly related between protocols (ICC = 0.98) and the mean difference was equal to 0.08 ± 0.11 L/min. Compared to INC, VO2peak from VER was not different in SCI (1.30 ± 0.45 L/min vs. 1.31 ± 0.43 L/min) but higher in AB (1.63 ± 0.40 L/min vs. 1.76 ± 0.40 L/min).

Conclusion:

Data show similar VO2peak between incremental and verification tests in SCI, suggesting that VER confirms VO2max attainment. However, in AB participants completing arm ergometry, VER is essential to validate appearance of ‘true’ VO2peak.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants for taking part in the protocol described in this study.

Disclaimer statements

Funding Funding was obtained for this project from a University GPSM grant, yet no federal funding (NIH, NSF, etc.) was obtained.

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the completion of this study.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.