The standing and walking assessment tool for individuals with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study of validity and clinical use

Abstract

Context/Objective: The Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) combines stages of walking recovery with measures of balance and walking. It standardizes the timing and content of walking assessment in inpatient rehabilitation. The study aims were: (1) Evaluate the content validity of the SWAT stages of walking recovery, and (2) Understand physical therapists' (PTs) experiences using the SWAT to gauge acceptance, implementation and impact.

Design: Qualitative, exploratory study.

Setting: Nine Canadian rehabilitation hospitals.

Participants: Thirty-four PTs who had used the SWAT ≥10 times.

Interventions: Seven focus group meetings were completed. Semi-structured questions queried the content, order and spacing of SWAT stages, and current SWAT use (i.e. processes, challenges, facilitators, impact on practice). Meetings were audio-recorded and transcribed. Themes and categories were derived through a conventional content analysis.

Outcome Measure: Not applicable.

Results: PTs agreed with the ordering and content of the SWAT stages, but reported unequal spacing between stages. Three themes related to PTs’ use of the SWAT were identified: (1) Variable process: SWAT implementation varied across sites, PTs and patients. (2) Implementation challenges: unfamiliarity of the SWAT, lack of time, not required by place of work, and patients who are outliers or have poor gait quality. (3) Potential to influence clinical decision-making: the SWAT did not influence clinical decisions, but PTs recognized the potential of the tool to do so.

Conclusions: Content validity of the SWAT stages was supported and implementation challenges identified. Variability in SWAT implementation may reflect the heterogeneity and person-centeredness of SCI rehabilitation.

Keywords:

• Walking
• Assessment
• Spinal cord injury
• Qualitative research

ORCID

Kristin E. Musselman http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-8211

Dany H. Gagnon http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-4667

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the Rick Hansen Institute, the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation and le Réseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation. JFL Lemay was funded by a Post-doctoral Fellowship from the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation.