100
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Triangulation of veteran and provider models of preventing community-acquired pressure injuries in spinal cord injury to reveal convergence and divergence of perspectives

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
 

Abstract

Context/Objective

Community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPrI) are a common and costly complication of spinal cord injury (SCI). The majority of PrIs occur in the community, but there is little guidance in CAPrI prevention. This study describes how provider and veteran perspectives of CAPrI prevention converge and diverge.

Design

The Farmer triangulation method was used to compare two models from previous qualitative research describing provider and veteran perspectives of CAPrI prevention based on the framework of CAPrI risks, resources, and preventive activities. The previous qualitative research revealed the provider model of CAPrI prevention using semi-structured interviews with interprofessional SCI providers at the Veteran Health Administration (VA) (n = 30). A qualitative descriptive design using photovoice (n = 30) with or without guided tours (n = 15) revealed the Veteran model of CAPrI prevention.

Setting

The previous qualitative research was conducted at three geographically different VA spinal cord injury/disorder centers in the United States (north, south, west).

Participants

30 interprofessional SCI providers; 30 Veterans living with SCI at three VA SCI Centers in the United States.

Interventions

n/a.

Outcome Measures

Provider-Veteran perspectives of CAPrI prevention that demonstrated agreement, partial agreement, divergence, and silence.

Results

Providers and veterans agreed on what is basic care, and the importance of family, caregiver and health provider/system supports, but they viewed motivation, veteran role, informal supports, and adequacy of supports differently.

Conclusion

Understanding how SCI providers and veterans living with SCI view prevention in the community informs how to promote preventive care in the context of veterans’ lives.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Individual Initiated Research Award (IIR 16-267, PI-Burkhart) from the United States (U.S.) Department of VA Health Services Research and Development Service. The contents do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.