Abstract
The concept of pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) consists of the phenomenon that communities in an ecosystem exhibit increased tolerance as a result of exposure to contaminants. Although a range of ‘classic’ ecological principles explains the processes that increase tolerance of a community, the value of PICT for ecological risk assessment was recognized only recently (Blanck et al. 1988). The following issues are recognized: First, regarding the question on the role of suspect compounds causing ecological effects, the PICT approach covers the issue of causality better than ‘classical’ ecological community response parameters like species densities or species diversity indices. This relates to the fact that the level of PICT is assumed to be relatively constant (compared to density and diversity), whereas the suspect compound causing the observed effect can be deduced with relative clear inference from artificial exposure experiments. Second, PICT directly addresses a level of biological organization (the community), the level of concern for many ecological risk assessment methods. Other methods for risk assessment, like toxicity testing or bioassays, focus on individual or population-level effects, and need extrapolation of the results to the field. Such extrapolation step may pose problems regarding validity of the outcome of risk assessment. The occurrence of PICT is, however, not (yet) a community endpoint that is sufficiently underpinned to trigger risk mitigation activities. This paper especially focuses on the possibility to improve risk assessment approaches by incorporation of PICT assessments, especially focusing on the issue of causality and on the ecological meaning of PICT. Despite the advantages over ‘classical’ parameters, literature analysis suggests that the PICT approach may be strengthened by determining to which degree the PICT approach relates to ecological changes, like shifts in community structure, functioning, and stability. The aim of this paper is to summarize some literature, putting the emphasis on terrestrial studies, to get insights whether PICT is a sensitive and powerful tool to quantify ecological effects in field conditions, to link them to toxicant stress, and thus to determine whether PICT may be taken into consideration in risk assessment.