Development and use of wild game consumption rates in human health risk assessments

ABSTRACT

Clearer guidance is recommended for evaluating site-specific chemical risks due to the consumption of wild game in human health risk assessment (HHRA), particularly in estimating consumption rate values for site-specific exposure modeling. This study reviewed site-specific HHRAs, survey data, regulatory documents, and scientific literature to evaluate the state of the practice for evaluating site-specific chemical risks via wild game consumption. Consumption rates of distinct wildlife species groups varied over three orders of magnitude (increasing from lowest to highest: waterfowl, terrestrial birds, small mammals, and cervids), and rates for all groups except cervids were lower than wild fish consumption rates. Wild game consumption rate values should be explicitly derived for site-specific HHRAs using one or more of the following approaches (in general order of lowest to highest uncertainty): (1) Empirical site-specific surveys; (2) Empirical surveys of comparable communities; (3) Modeling of local game harvest data; (4) Use of a nationally applicable default value; (5) Modeling of legally harvestable game limits; and (6) Modeling based on estimates of total meat consumption. Data are readily available such that approximate nationally applicable default values could be developed. More precise guidance and data for different wildlife species groups, regions, and consumers would improve HHRAs including this exposure pathway.

KEYWORDS:

• survey
• diet assessment
• hunting
• risk assessment guidance

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Steve Washburn, Annette Guiseppi-Elie, and Ralph Stahl, Jr., for their thoughtful comments on a draft of this article.

Funding

This work was funded by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company. The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors.