671
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Readability of Educational Materials to Support Parent Sexual Communication With Their Children and Adolescents

, &
 

Abstract

Sexual communication is a principal means of transmitting sexual values, expectations, and knowledge from parents to their children and adolescents. Many parents seek information and guidance to support talking with their children about sex and sexuality. Parent education materials can deliver this guidance but must use appropriate readability levels to facilitate comprehension and motivation. This study appraised the readability of educational materials to support parent sexual communication with their children. Fifty brochures, pamphlets, and booklets were analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index methods. Mean readability grade-level scores were 8.3 (range = 4.5–12.8), 9.7 (range = 5.5–14.9), and 10.1 (range = 6.7–13.9), respectively. Informed by National Institutes of Health–recommended 6th to 7th grade levels and American Medical Association–recommended 5th to 6th grade levels, percentages falling at or below the 7.0 grade level were calculated as 38%, 12%, and 2% and those falling at or below the 6.0 grade level were calculated as 12%, 2%, and 0% based on the Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and SMOG methods, respectively. These analyses indicate that the majority of educational materials available online to support parents’ communication with their children about sex and sexuality do not meet the needs of many or most parents. Efforts to improve the accessibility of these materials are warranted.

Acknowledgment

We thank Zosha Kandel for research support.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the Ford Foundation and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

Notes

1 Gobbledygook is defined by Merriam-Webster as “speech or writing that is complicated and difficult to understand” (gobbledygook, Citation2015).

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the Ford Foundation and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.