21
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Influence of Structural Differences of Dextromethorphan and its Three Metabolites on their Simultaneous Separation using Various Silica Columns with a Simple Aqueous Mobile Phase

, , , &
Pages 97-106 | Received 18 Mar 2007, Accepted 24 May 2007, Published online: 06 Nov 2007
 

Abstract

The retention behaviors and efficiencies of the chromatographic separation of dextromethorphan (DM) and its metabolites (dextrorphan (DX), 3‐methoxymorphinan (MM), and 3‐hydroxymorphinan (HM)), on three different silica columns (Inertsil, μ‐Porasil, and Lichrospher), were compared using a simple aqueous mobile phase consisting of an organic solvent (methanol or acetonitrile) and water at different volume ratios (1∶9 to 9∶1) containing triethylamine (TEA) and acetic acid (ACH). Results demonstrated that the retention capacities for basic compounds with the same ionization conditions of the silanol group were the largest for the Lichrospher column, followed by the μ‐Porasil one, with the Inertsil column exhibiting the lowest level. Based on their physical characteristics, the larger retention capacities for DM and its three metabolites in the LiChrospher column compared to those of the Inertsil and μ‐Porasil columns may have been because the LiChrospher column has the largest surface area for interaction. However, since the surface areas of the Inertsil and μ‐Porasil columns are similar, the greater retention capacities for DM and its three metabolites in the μ‐Porasil column can probably be attributed to the existence of a greater number of silanol groups than in the Inersil column. This also demonstrates that the interaction of tertiary amines with ionized silanol groups is greater than that of secondary amines resulting in the elution order being MM>DM and HM>DX. However, O‐demethylation to expose metabolites with a phenolic hydroxy group seemed to decrease the retention capacity, thus yielding the elution order of DX>DM (tertiary amine) and HM>MM (secondary amine). This might be attributable to the negative charge repulsion between phenoxyl groups (PhO) and ionized silanol groups (SiO) decreasing the affinity of basic compounds.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.