191
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Simultaneous Densitometric Determination of 6-Gingerol, 8-Gingerol, 10-Gingerol, and 6-Shogaol in Some Commercial Gingers

, , , &
Pages 567-577 | Received 20 Aug 2008, Accepted 15 Sep 2008, Published online: 22 Jan 2009
 

Abstract

A simple and rapid densitometric method has been developed for determination of 6-gingerol, 8-gingerol, 10-gingerol, and 6-shogaol in some commercial gingers. After extracting the samples four times with methanol, the solutions were spotted on precoated Lichrosphere Si 60F254 HPTLC plates, which were eluted with a mixture of toluene–ethyl acetate (3:1, v/v). Quantitative evaluation was performed by measuring the absorbance reflectance of the analyte spots at λ = 577 nm after being sprayed with anisaldehyde-H2SO4 reagent. The HPTLC-densitometric method is cheap, selective, precise, and accurate and can be used for routine analysis of gingers in the herbal drugs industry quality control laboratories.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are very grateful to Camag, Muttenz, Switzerland for providing method MOA 010, and Mr. Fajar Zulkarnain Lubis (Assessment, Service Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Airlangga University) for preparing the figures.

Notes

a Caculated by using winCats 1.4.2 (Camag).

b Relative process standard deviation of the linear curve.[ Citation 17 ]

c Fcalculated of ANOVA linearity testing (p < 0.0001).

d Test value for homogeneity of the linear curve[ Citation 17 ] (p < 0.05).

e Detection Limit (ng spot−1), calculated from Xp value.[ Citation 17 ]

f Quantification Limit (ng spot−1), calculated as 3 times of DL value.[ Citation 19 ]

a DW = dry weight.

b Values were expressed as Mean (% dry weight; n = 3); values in parentheses showed RSD (in %).

c % from original content.

a Data presented as RSD (%) for n = 3.

b Each measurement was performed by a different analyst on the different days, and HPTLC plates within one laboratory.

a Values were expressed as Mean (% dry weight; n = 3); values in parentheses showed RSD (in %).

b Number after the code of the varieties (G, E, M) means samples from different markets.

a Mobile phase composition presented in v/v.

b Values were expressed as Mean (% dry weight; n = 3); values in parentheses showed RSD (%).

a Calculated from data presented on Table 5.

b Calculation was performed by using Unscrambler 9.6 software (CAMO) NS = not significant (for p = 0,05); p = probability value.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.