83
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

VALIDATED STABILITY-INDICATING HPTLC AND HPLC METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF PIPAZETHATE AND ITS DEGRADANT

, &
Pages 1850-1869 | Published online: 12 Oct 2011
 

Abstract

This paper describes validated high-performance thin-layer chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography methods for the simultaneous determination of pipazethate hydrochloride (PZ) and its degradant. The HPTLC separation was carried out on Merck HPTLC aluminum sheets of silica gel 60 F254 as stationary phase using chloroform:diethylamine:methanol (9.4:0.1:0.5, v/v/v) as a mobile phase. Quantification was achieved using densitometric measurements at 225 nm. The isocratic reversed phase HPLC separation was performed on 5 µm CN column (Luna, Phenomenex®, USA.). Good resolution between PZ and its degradants was achieved using a mixture of acetonitrile:12 mM ammonium acetate:diethylamine (35:65:0.1, v/v/v, pH 4.0) as a mobile phase. Quantitation was achieved with UV detection at 225 nm based on peak area. Forced degradation studies were performed on bulk sample of PZ using acid (1N hydrochloric acid), alkaline (0.1N sodium hydroxide), oxidation (0.33% hydrogen peroxide), heat (75°C), and photolytic degradation. The proposed HPLC method was utilized to investigate the kinetics of acidic, alkaline, and oxidative degradation processes of PZ at different temperatures and the apparent pseudo-first-order rate constant, half-life, and activation energy were calculated. The pH-rate profile of degradation of PZ in Britton-Robinson buffer solutions within the pH range 1.8–11.4 was studied.

Notes

a Y = a + b × for DG1 and Y = a + b X + C X2 for PZ where X is the concentration of drug in µg/spot, and Y is peak area of the band.

b 95% confidence limit.

a Y = a + bC, where C is the concentration in µg mL−1 and Y is the peak area.

b 95% confidence limit.

The retention time of unretained peak is 0.697 min.

a1, b1: are α and Rs calculated for DG3 – DG4.

a2, b2: are α and Rs calculated for DG4 – PZ.

a3, b3: are α and Rs calculated for PZ – DG1.

a Mean and S.D., percentage recovery from the label claim amount.

b Theoretical values for t and F.

c For standard addition of different concentrations of PZ, DG1, DG3, and DG4.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.