168
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Harm Reduction

Drug Users' Participation in a Free Hepatitis B Vaccination Program: Demographic, Behavioral, and Social-Cognitive Determinants

, , , , , & show all
Pages 2145-2162 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

The present study was conducted as an evaluation of a two-year pilot program started in 1998 in the Netherlands to provide free hepatitis B vaccination targeted at drug users (DUs). In order to identify which demographic and social-cognitive factors predict vaccination uptake, written questionnaires were distributed in three pilot regions (Amsterdam, Tiel, and Maastricht) amongst all DUs that were invited to participate in the program during a 2-month period. Vaccination behavior 2 years later was anonymously and prospectively linked to the questionnaire data, which allowed us to investigate which factors predict vaccination behavior. Of the 207 DUs eligible for vaccination (i.e., who were not immune and/or had no current infection with the virus), 93 DUs had obtained vaccination in the 2 years following the questionnaire. More than half of them (N = 50) had completed the full program (3 injections). As possible predictors of vaccination uptake, the questionnaire included constructs of the Theory of Planned Behavior as well as of the Health Belief Model. Our results show that attitude toward obtaining hepatitis B vaccination was positively associated with intention toward obtaining hepatitis B vaccination. However, perceived behavioral control was found to be the only construct related to actual vaccination uptake. None of the demographic variables were related to vaccination uptake. Our findings suggest that future interventions aimed at increasing uptake of vaccination against hepatitis B in DUs should address DUs (perceived) control concerning this behavior. The study's limitations are noted.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, and the Netherlands Association for Community Health Services. We thank the Amsterdam Municipal Health Service for their cooperation.

Notes

1 Note: R2 = .08 for step 1, .27 for step 2 (p = .000), and .29 for step 3 (p = .07).

1 Note: Nagelkerke R-square = .05 for step 1; Nagelkerke R-square = .05 for step 2 (p = .40); Nagelkerke R-square = .07 for step 3 (p = .17). Hosmer Lemeshow Chi-square = 9.95, p = .27.

1 Note: Nagelkerke R-square = .07 for step 1; Nagelkerke R-square = .10 for step 2 (p = .27); Nagelkerke R-square = .11 for step 3 (p = .66); Nagelkerke R-square = .15 for step 4 (p = .21). Hosmer Lemeshow Chi-square = 8.80, p = .36.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.