![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Background: The town of Norseman introduced a Voluntary Liquor Agreement (voluntary restrictions on alcohol sales) in 2008, to reduce problematic drinking. This study examined its long-term impact. Methods: Quantitative data on alcohol (cask wine, fortified wine, spirits) wholesale sales, hospital emergency visits and alcohol related offenses were compared from before to after the introduction of the restrictions. Qualitative interview data were collected from 10 key informants and from focus groups with Indigenous residents. Results: Consumption of cask wine declined in the short and long term. Fortified wine consumption did not change in the short term, but declined in the long term. Spirit consumption did not change in the short term, but increased in the long term. Total beverage consumption did not change at any time. There was no change in hospital emergency visits. There was a decline in Indigenous and non-Indigenous burglary and assault offenses, and a decline in Indigenous domestic violence. Police tasking (callouts) declined. Key informants and focus group participants indicated the behavior of drinkers, alcohol consumption, alcohol harms and community climate had all improved. Conclusions: These findings indicate that alcohol restrictions, backed by the community, can have a long-term impact on local alcohol problems.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all those members of the Norseman community who contributed to the research process.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest with respect to the research reported in this article.
Funding
This research was funded by the Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education (FARE) and the National Drug Research Institute (NDRI), Curtin University.