![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Background: In line with policy recommendations from the World Confederation of Physical Therapy, Australia (AUS), and the United States (USA) actively promote postprofessional physical therapist education. Although postprofessional education pathways vary, the goal of educating specialists within the profession is shared.
Objectives: In order to advance education, and ultimately the profession, it is necessary to understand what is offered for postprofessional programs. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare physical therapist postprofessional education in two regions of the world.
Methods: Data were collected from relevant professional organizations, electronic media, and academic programs. Descriptive statistics were generated to compare postprofessional programs in AUS and USA.
Major Findings: Variation was demonstrated in postprofessional education between both countries. Notably, the number of programs was observed to be growing in the USA, but declining in AUS, where six programs closed during data collection. AUS offered 41 postprofessional programs, while the USA offered 242 residency, and 49 fellowship, programs. USA and AUS had the most programs in musculoskeletal/sports, 42.6% and 24.4%, respectively. Conversely, geriatrics comprised only 7.4% of USA residence programs and 0% of AUS clinical academic programs.
Conclusion: This research compared postprofessional education in AUS and USA and demonstrated universal issues related to accessibility and programming. The declining number of programs in AUS is of great concern and warrants evaluation of postprofessional education globally. Educators need to ensure that postprofessional education is accessible, innovative, meets the population needs. This research demonstrates opportunities for international collaboration within the physical therapy profession to advance education and ultimately the profession.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank: Dr. Peter Fazey PhD, FACP, Specialist Musculoskeletal Physiotherapist, for reviewing this document and providing the perspective that only comes with being the past president of the Australian Physiotherapy Association and the past president of the Australian College of Physiotherapists; Kendra L. Harrington, PT, DPT, MS, WSC for reviewing and editing the content related to ABPTRFE; Alan Howard, MS, The Director of the UVM Statistical Consulting Clinic, for his tireless assistance with the mapping of this data; Shannon Smith BS, Jillian Tanych BS, EP-C, Katrina Kunker BS and Christine Richards BFA, UVM Doctor of Physical Therapy Graduate students, for their assistance with this project.