The European Union Higher Education Policy and the Stake of Regionalization

Abstract

This paper attempts to explore the underlying nature and terms of Higher Education policy. Higher Education policy cannot be viewed outside the changing conditions of the state especially when the inquiry centres on Europe. In the European context, policy making, in order to be efficient, seems to be conducted on two levels, the supranational and the regional. This change in the structure of Higher Education policy making can be considered as an outcome of globalization and the current market economy. The EU's Higher Education policy may be expected to go beyond the national into the supranational level of cooperation with the launching of new initiatives resulting from the Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area. These initiatives are reshaping the role and responsibilities of Higher Education Institutes towards society and the market. The new role that these institutes are called upon to play indicates a clear tendency towards dissemination and the growing need for cooperation at the regional level.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr Ioannis Fragkoulis, of the Department of Political Science, The University of Crete, for his valuable contribution to the present paper.

Notes

Notes

1. R. Cowen, “Performativity, Post-modernity and the University,” Comparative Education 32.2 (1996): 245–58.

2. D Gravaris, “From the State to the State: Rationality and Rules of Legitimization in Higher Education,” in Education and Educational Policies between State and the Market (in Greek), ed. D. Gravaris and N. Papadakis (Athens: Savalas, 2005), 27–50.

3. See A. Lipietz, Mirages and Miracles, The Crisis of Global Fordism (London: Verso, 1989); P. Hirst and G. Thompson, Globalization in Question (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996); “Analysis of In-service Teacher Strategies in Member Countries of the EC,” in Commission of the European Communities: Analysis of the European Communities (Brussels, 1989), 109; Nikos Papadakis, “European Educational Policy and the Challenges of the Post-industrial Society: Towards the Learning Society,” in Education, Modernization and Peripheral Community, ed. P. Alheit, H. Olesen and S. Papaioannou (Roskilde: RUC, 1998), 11–55; D. Gravaris and Nikos Papadakis, “Educational Policy beyond Consensus-Reductionism: Do We Need a New Educational-Policy-Researching-Paradigm in the Context of ‘Market-Driven’ Educational Systems?” Paper presented at the 20th CESE Conference, London, 19 July 2002.

4. U Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash, Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994), 153–63.

5. Papadakis, “European Educational Policy and the Challenges of the Post-industrial Society.”

6. See Education at a Glance (Paris: OECD, 2001), chap. 3.

7. Nikos Papadakis, Between Potentiality and Necessity (Athens: A. S. Equality, 2005).

8. European Commission White Paper, Teaching and Learning: Towards a Learning Society, ed. EC/Directorate General Education and Culture (Brussels, 1995); UNESCO—International Institute for Educational Planning, Major Programme I: Towards Lifelong Learning for All (28C/5–II.A) (Paris: UNESCO, 1995), 40.

9. See G8: Aims and Ambitions for Lifelong Learning (1999), available at: http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/summit/1999koln/charter.htm.

10. P Krugman, “Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession,” Foreign Affairs 73.2 (1994): 29–30.

11. See Amartya Sen, On Ethics and Economics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), 40–51.

12. D Gravaris, “Morality and Economy in Amartya Sen's Thought” (in Greek), Isopolitei 3.2 (October 1999): 275–98.

13. See Sen, On Ethics and Economics, 39.

14. Education at a Glance, chap. A3 (48–52), especially 48, and chap. B (53–118).

15. See “Education and Training 2010 in the European Commission,” in Progress towards the Common Objectives in Education and Training: Indicators and Benchmarks (Brussels: EC DG Education & Culture, 2004), sec. 73.

16. K Lavdas, “Public Spheres in EU's Political System” (in Greek), Political Science 1 (2002): 62–91.

17. K Lavdas, Interests and Politics (in Greek) (Athens: Papazisis, 2004).

18. D Kladis, “The Social Dimension of the Bologna Follow-Up Process,” in State, Society, Market and Policies in Education (in Greek), ed. Nikos Papadakis (Athens: Savallas, 2003), 56–63.

19. European Ministers of Education, The European Higher Education Area: Joint Declaration, Bologna, 19 June 1999.

20. European Ministers of Education, Realizing the European Higher Education Area, Berlin, 19 September 2003, 2.

21. European Ministers of Education, Towards the European Higher Education Area, Prague, 19 May 2001.

22. European Ministers of Education, Realizing the European Higher Education Area.

23. European Ministers of Education, The European Higher Education Area—Achieving the Goals, Bergen, 19–20 May 2005, 4.

24. D Kladis, “Quality Assurance, European Credit Transfer System and Implementation of the Bologna Process in Different European Countries.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Quality Assurance, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Dniprotrovsk, Ukraine, 15–16 April 2004, 3.

25. Nikos Papadakis, Theofano Tsakanika and J. Bouzakis, “The New Regional Challenge in Higher Education Policy Agenda.” Paper presented at the International Conference of Comparative Education Society in Europe (CESE), CESE, Copenhagen, 31 June 2004.

26. See A. Hasan, Rethinking Tertiary Education in a Global Economy (report EDU/EC) (Paris: OECD, 2003), 7; Thematic Review of Tertiary Education: Guidelines for Country Participation in the Review, report presented in the OECD meeting of National Representatives, Paris, 15–16 April 2004.

27. T S. Popkewitz, “Educational Reform as the Organization of a Ritual: Stability as Change,” Journal of Education 164.1 (1982): 5–29.

28. M Giugni and J. Berclaz, “Political–Cultural–Economic: Specifying the Concept of Opportunity Structures for Contentious Politics.” Announcement at the International Conference on Contentious Politics and the Economic Opportunity Structure, University of Crete, Rethymnon, 17 October 2002.

29. A R. Ball and B. Guy Peters, Modern Politics and Government (London: Macmillan, 2000).

30. See Commission of the European Communities, Increasing Labour Force Participation and Promoting Active Ageing. Joint report submitted to the Barcelona European Council on 24 January 2002; and The Future of the European Employment Strategy (EES): A Strategy for Full Employment and Better Jobs for All (Brussels, 2003); M. M. Ferree, “The Political Context of Rationality: Rational Choice Theory and Resource Mobilization,” in Frontiers in Social Movements Theory, ed. A. D. Morris and C. Mueller (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992).