Abstract
It is a common experience, confirmed in a recent co-operative action, that finite element simulations of the machining of soft carbon steels (when continuous chips are formed) do not correctly predict all three together of cutting force, thrust force and chip thickness ratio. This paper investigates the possibility that the source of error is in modelling the work materials' strain hardening behaviour, in ignoring the yield delay phenomenon that also shows itself as an upper yield point. First, the capability of a particular software to include an upper yield point is demonstrated. Then, the general effects of inclusion are shown before finally comparing simulations and experiments for a BS 970 070M20 steel (similar to AISI 1021). For agreement with experiment, not only an upper yield point, but also a correct dependence of flow stress on strain rate and temperature, is needed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank Professor H. Attia (McGill University), Professor J. C. Aurich (Kaiserslautern University) and Dr. H. A. Kishawy (University of Ontario Institute of Technology) for permission to cite their unpublished work that was part of a cooperative action within Scientific Technical Committee C (cutting) of CIRP (International Academy for Production Engineering). We also wish to thank Dr. D. Umbrello and Dr. S. Rizzuti for making available the original data from Filice et al. (Citation2008) that enabled us to construct Figure .