308
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Feature Articles

How Much Telematics Information Do Insurers Need for Claim Classification?

, &
 

Abstract

It has been shown several times in the literature that telematics data collected in motor insurance help to better understand an insured’s driving risk. Insurers who use these data reap several benefits, such as a better estimate of the pure premium, more segmented pricing, and less adverse selection. The flip side of the coin is that collected telematics information is often sensitive and can therefore compromise policyholders’ privacy. Moreover, due to their large volume, this type of data is costly to store and hard to manipulate. These factors, combined with the fact that insurance regulators tend to issue more and more recommendations regarding the collection and use of telematics data, make it important for an insurer to determine the right amount of telematics information to collect. In addition to traditional contract information such as the age and gender of the insured, we have access to a telematics dataset where information is summarized by trip. We first derive several features of interest from these trip summaries before building a claim classification model using both traditional and telematics features. By comparing a few classification algorithms, we find that logistic regression with lasso penalty is the most suitable for our problem. Using this model, we develop a method to determine how much information about policyholders’ driving should be kept by an insurer. Using real data from a North American insurance company, we find that telematics data become redundant after about 3 months or 4000 km of observation, at least from a claim classification perspective.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge The Co-operators for both financial support and for providing the data used in this paper through the Co-operators Chair in Actuarial Risk Analysis. The authors also thank the editors and the three anonymous reviewers for providing feedback and helping them.

FUNDING

The authors thank The Co-operators and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for funding.

Discussions on this article can be submitted until July 1, 2023. The authors reserve the right to reply to any discussion. Please see the Instructions for Authors found online at http://www.tandfonline.com/uaaj for submission instructions.

Notes

1 Table 2 of this article informs us that 99.5% of the policyholders have one claim or less.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.