872
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Metaphorical Character of Moral Cognition: A Comparative and Decompositional Analysis

 

Abstract

This article studies the moral metaphor system focusing on a subsystem consisting of five pairs of MORAL and IMMORAL metaphors whose source concepts represent some contrastive categories in our visual experience: WHITE and BLACK, LIGHT and DARK, CLEAR and MURKY, CLEAN and DIRTY, PURE and IMPURE. The study examines whether these moral metaphors are manifested in Chinese and English, looking for linguistic evidence in both languages. It is found that the studied moral metaphors are applicable in both languages at varying degrees. This finding suggests that these metaphors may range from being widespread to being universal. The study then further analyzes them regarding whether they are primary or complex metaphors and whether they are equal in status, applying a decompositional approach to metaphor analysis. The result suggests that the moral metaphors under study are complex rather than primary metaphors, and that they are actually not equal in status, some depending on others in meaning making in our moral cognition. If the analysis is valid, the implications are: some conceptual metaphors are more fundamental than others, those that are more fundamental are more likely to be widespread or universal, and hypotheses can be made about conceptual metaphors based on in-depth analysis of their conceptual composition.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author is very grateful to Ray Gibbs and an anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments and useful suggestions, which have led to much improvement in the revision of the paper.

Notes

1 My suggestion that GOOD IS PURE is not a primary metaphor is based on the observation that PURE (“unmixed with other matter”) is inherently neutral with two possible alternatives in value: “unmixed with unwanted (positive)/wanted (negative) matter.” Thus, e.g., in “pure folly” and “pure terrorism” (from COCA), pure is not positive in meaning. That is, PURE is a more complex concept than is CLEAN, which is intrinsically positive and more basic in character, simply meaning “free from dirt or unwanted matter.”

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.