Publication Cover
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering
Volume 42, 2007 - Issue 2
397
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Behaviour and fate of tetracycline in river and wetland waters on the Canadian Northern Great Plains

, &
Pages 109-117 | Received 25 May 2006, Published online: 02 Mar 2007
 

Abstract

Very little is known about the factors affecting the behaviour, degradation and persistence of tetracycline in sensitive Prairie freshwater aquatic systems in Canada. Reported are results of studies conducted for the first time of tetracycline behaviour in Prairie river and wetland waters. For comparison, studies were also conducted using distilled water as a control. Different amounts of spiked tetracycline (0, 50 and 80 percent) was adsorbed by distilled, river and wetland water, respectively. These different amounts are likely due to the differences in the matrixes of the three waters. In wetland water, the addition of EDTA generally promoted the release of tetracycline indicating that a portion of the tetracycline was bound to metal ions. Decreasing the pH of the wetland water led to increased adsorption of tetracycline suggesting either that tetracycline epimerizes or binds, by hydrogen bonding, to acidic portions of organic material in the water. However, in wetland water, a significant portion of the spiked tetracycline (≅ 50%) was irreversibly bound to the water matrix and was not released by adding EDTA and/or by varying the pH. In laboratory experiments, the t1/2 of “free-form” tetracycline exposed to light (L+) in non-sterile waters was 32, 2 and 3 days in distilled, river and wetland water respectively, while in waters with no light exposure (L), they were 83, 18 and 13 days. Similarly, t1/2 of tetracycline in L+ sterile waters treatments was 9, 1 and 1 day for distilled, river and wetland water, respectively, and 18, 11 and 7 days in the L. In the experiment conducted in natural sunlight, tetracycline t1/2 in the presence of ultraviolet radiation (UV) treatments was 26, 17 and 18 min in distilled, river and wetland water and 39, 28 and 32 min in the absence of UV treatment. The combination of the effects of matrixes of the water, light and UV radiation therefore play a significant role in catalyzing the removal of tetracycline from different Prairie waters. In deep waters and in systems where sunlight is highly attenuated, the effects of light on tetracycline may be considerably reduced.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ken Supeene, George Swerhone and Randy Schmidt for technical assistance. The Institute for Wetland and Water Research of Ducks Unlimited is thanked for financial support and National Water Research Institute of Environment Canada for use of laboratory space and equipment.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.