Publication Cover
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering
Volume 42, 2007 - Issue 4
391
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Nitrate removal and denitrification affected by soil characteristics in nitrate treatment wetlands

, , , &
Pages 471-479 | Received 16 May 2006, Published online: 05 Mar 2007
 

Abstract

Several small-scale surface flow constructed wetlands unplanted and planted (monoculture) with various macrophytes (Phragmites australis, Typha orientalis, Pennisetum purpureum, Ipomoea aquatica, and Pistia stratiotes) were established to continuously receive nitrate-contaminated groundwater. Soil characteristics and their effects on nitrate removal and soil denitrification were investigated. The results showed that planted wetland cells exhibited significantly higher (P < 0.05) nitrate removal efficiencies (70–99%) and soil denitrification rates (3.78–15.02 μ g N2O-N/g dry soil/h) than an unplanted covered wetland cell (1%, 0.11 μ g N2O-N/g/h). However, the unplanted uncovered wetland cell showed a nitrate removal efficiency (55%) lower than but a soil denitrification rate (9.12 μg N2O-N/g/h) comparable to the planted cells. The nitrate removal rate correlated closely and positively with the soil denitrification rate for the planted cells, indicating that soil denitrification is an important process for removing nitrate in constructed wetlands. The results of nitrogen budget revealed that around 68.9–90.7% of the overall nitrogen removal could be attributed to the total denitrification. The soil denitrification rate was found to correlate significantly (P < 0.01) with the extractable organic carbon, organic matter, and in situ-measured redox potential of wetland soil, which accordingly were concluded as suitable indicators of soil denitrification rate and nitrate removal rate in nitrate treatment wetlands.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China for financially supporting this research under Contract Number NSC 91-2211-E-041-014.

Notes

*PH, TY, PE, IP, and PI denote wetland cells planted with Phragmites, Typha, Pennisetum, Ipomoea, and Pistia, respectively. OC is an unplanted cell with open cover, and CC is an unplanted cell with black cover.

*PH, TY, PE, IP, and PI denote wetland cells planted with Phragmites, Typha, Pennisetum, Ipomoea, and Pistia, respectively. OC is an unplanted cell with open cover, and CC is an unplanted cell with black cover.

*NV = negative value.

**ND = no determination because of no plant being harvested.

***PH, TY, PE, IP, and PI denote wetland cells planted with Phragmites, Typha, Pennisetum, Ipomoea, and Pistia, respectively. OC is an unplanted cell with open cover, and CC is an unplanted cell with black cover.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.