417
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: What do we Know about the Role of Occupational and Environmental Determinants? A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

, , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
 

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this systematic review of original articles published up until August 2021 and meta-analyses were to identify the links between occupational and non-occupational environmental exposures, types of occupations and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Sixteen selected case-control studies were qualified as good level with Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Sensitivity analyses highlighted the role of choice of control group, tobacco adjustment and diagnostic tools. Significantly increased risks of IPF were observed (OR (95%CI): for metals (1.42(1.05–1.92)), wood (OR:1.32(1.02–1.71)), and general dust (OR:1.32(1.08–1.63)) exposures. Subgroup analyses found a significantly elevated risk for: hardwood (OR:1.75 (1.13–2.70)), organic dusts (OR:1.72 (1.20–2.46)) and pesticides (OR:2.30 (1.30–4.08)), while no significant change was noted for softwoods and solvents. Smoking adjustments: general dust (1.45 (1.04–2.03)/organic dust (2.5 (1.49–4.22)/metals (1.87 (1.16–3)/wood dust OR: 1.16 (0.86–1.61)/pesticide exposure 2.4 (0.84–6.9) were calculated. Among agricultural workers, the risk was also increased (OR:2.06 (1.02–4.16)). Few environmental data were available and no significant associations detected. Thus, these meta-analyses highlighted the role of some occupational exposures in IPF occurrence. A more accurate and thorough assessment of exposures over the entire working life as well as on the duration and intensity of exposure and complex of multi-pollutant exposure is needed in future research and clinical practice.

Graphical Abstract

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [YE], upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Professor Marie-Pierre Baduel (English teacher) for her help in proofreading the article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author Contributions

Conception and design: Y.E. AC; Methodology: Y.E. AP; Review of literature: AP, CG, AC. Formal analysis: Y.E, AP; Substantial contributions to interpretation of data and have been involved in revising the manuscript it critically for important intellectual content: JCP, IB, AD; Writing and editing: YE, AP.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2022.2131663

Additional information

Funding

No sponsor and specific funding had a role in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.