Leachate decontamination through biological processes coupled to advanced oxidation: A review

ABSTRACT

The landfill leachate is considered a toxic effluent composed of recalcitrant contaminants that requires innovative alternatives for its decontamination. Coupling between advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) and aerobic biological treatments are highlighted in this research. Therefore, a bibliographic review of the research made from 2010 to 2021 was developed. These combined alternatives were applied in leachates, and it is oriented toward the analysis of knowledge gaps, trends, and future proposals of the treatment combined that contribute to researchers who wish to work on the subject. These kinds of treatments were chosen due to a bibliometric analysis made. Also, the information was searched in several scientific database. This work was found to be unpublished, as no reviews were found so far that agglomerate studies of coupling between photocatalytic and aerobic biological processes to treat leachates. Besides, AOPs are ideal for treating wastewater of complex composition, however, when it is used as the only treatment, they are usually unprofitable, which justifies their coupling with biological treatments. Subsequently, it was determined that the knowledge main gap is the lack of documentation of treatment costs, which makes it difficult to implement on a real scale. In addition to this, the couplings trends are toward doping with metallic and nonmetallic ions of the catalyst used in the photocatalytic process to improve the efficiency of these. Finally, future research should work on finding alternatives that allow the optimization of the resources used in the combined systems and on promoting the recovery of existing products in the leachate.

Implications: Leachates generate several environmental impacts due to their toxic composition. Even when coupling between heterogeneous photocatalysis and biologic treatment can solve them, issues like cost analysis and the scaling-up factor have not been developed, and futures researchers should work on that. Besides, the trend founded in almost all investigations was the catalyst doping with metals and nonmetals ions, particularly when they use TiO2 because it gives the possibility of improving efficiencies just with a structural variation. Finally, these treatment combinations require more analyses and comparison of their remotion over emerging pollutants and their performance with new designs.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Credit authorship contribution statement

This work was planned, executed, and discussed by all authors in equal contribution.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by The Ministry of Science, technology, and innovation of Colombia in the framework of the ”Becas de excelencia doctoral del Bicentenario”, with resources of the ”Fondo de Ciencia, tecnología e innovación del Sistema general de regalias de Colombia”.

Notes on contributors

Salvador Villamizar

Salvador Villamizar. Civil Engineering Ph.D. Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla – Colombia. Water and wastewater treatment emphasis.

Aymer Maturana Cordoba

Aymer Maturana Cordoba. Ph.D., Thermal engineer, fluids, and biofuels - Universidad de São Paulo. Universidad del Norte Professor, Barranquilla – Colombia. Water and wastewater treatments emphasis.

Joseph Soto

Joseph Soto-Verjel. Civil Engineering Ph.D. Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla – Colombia. Water and wastewater treatment emphasis.