![Sample our Engineering & Technology journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5933/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Engineering-Tech.jpg"})
Abstract
Traditionally, rarefaction curves are used to test sampling sufficiency; however, such measures are not always robust. Similarly, the Pareto Principle and “90/70”rule, commonly applied to biological sampling, are also inappropriate for palaeontological data. Here, we argue that the sufficiency of sampling could be determined by the consistency between a calculated diversity and the “actual” diversity. We have applied a method introduced from biology to estimate the species richness at four localities with the early Silurian brachiopod Cathaysiorthis fauna in South China and to estimate their actual diversity using the software EstimateS. Sample size corresponding to a given diversity was calculated by means of curve fitting, which can provide important information on future sampling strategies. Diversity estimation is a relatively immature field in palaeontology that promises accurate diversity comparisons. Here, we suggest that rarefaction should be accompanied by estimation assessment to extract from samples the most comprehensive diversity information available.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Prof. Rong Jiayu (NIGP, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for his suggestions early in the study. Financial support for this study was from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos 41002001, 41221001 and 41290260) and the Danish Council for Independent Research. This paper is a contribution to IGCP 591 “Early to Middle Paleozoic Revolution”.