738
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Encounters between older adults and occupational therapists during the assistive technology application process

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 280-288 | Received 19 Jan 2018, Accepted 16 Nov 2018, Published online: 19 Jan 2019
 

ABSTACT

Background: From the perspective of older adults, the assistive technology application process is complex and their perceived involvement varies. Occupational therapists find it challenging to satisfy their clients’ needs while complying with the eligibility criteria of the service provision system. Research has shown that, from the perspective of both clients and occupational therapists, the application process is perceived to be challenging. However, little is known about which specific actions and experiences during the application process give rise to this perceived complexity.

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate older adults’ and occupational therapists’ actions and experiences of their encounters during the assistive technology application process.

Material and method: Data were generated using repeated participant observations and informal interviews. Ricoeur’s theory of interpretation was used to interpret and discuss the data generated.

Results: Two themes emerged: Expressing needs and translating needs.

Conclusion: Older adults express their needs in different ways. When the older adults’ expression of needs does not correspond with the service provision system’s conditions of eligibility, the occupational therapists act as mediators, by translating experienced needs so that they are expressed in a way that corresponds to the expression of the eligibility criteria.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the older adults and the occupational therapists who participated in the study, Åse Brandt for discussions about the manuscript and Birthe D. Pedersen for constructive discussions about Ricoeur’s theory of interpretation.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by University College Lillebaelt and the Danish Association of Occupational Therapists.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.