1,675
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Comparison between adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for different knee surgical procedures. A meta-analysis of randomized trials

, &
Pages 491-500 | Received 25 Aug 2021, Accepted 20 Sep 2021, Published online: 12 Oct 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Femoral nerve block (FNB) is a prevalent technique for analgesia following knee surgeries, but it also results in quadriceps weakness and greater chances of falling. Adductor canal block (ACB) is advertised as a motor nervesparing alternative to FNB.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to compare adductor canal block with femoral nerve block as regard different surgical procedures of the knee.

Study design

Meta-analysis was used to address this concern.

Sittings

Meta-analysis-based study following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Methods

The database MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane were systemically searched to detect all published randomized and prospective clinical trials comparing adductor canal block with femoral nerve block as regard different surgical procedures of the knee in the last five years.

Results

Eighteen studies were identified for inclusion in this study, involving a total of 1457 patients. The risk of bias was low. Meta-analysis revealed that groups receiving femoral nerve blocks experience a significant decrease in pain scores and analgesic medication usage. However, adductor canal block groups have a significantly lower rate of quadriceps muscle weakness than FNB groups.

Conclusion

Femoral nerve block provides more analgesia and reduces analgesic consumption. On the other hand, adductor canal block, in the early postoperative period, preserves quadriceps function.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. This work was not subject to ethical review. The findings provided in this paper have not been previously published in their entirety or in part.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.