The significance of the category of soul in the theoretical structure of bioethics

Abstract

Environmental ethics needs an “axiological bridge” between natural and cultural environments. This enables it to attribute certain rights to nonhumans as well as specific moral duties to Homo sapiens. The way is thru evolutionary ethics which is the natural history of moral sensitivity as well as the ability to value. Ethology, sociobiology, zoopsychology, and zoosemiotics are supposed to provide evolutionary ethics with relevant data, and ethics, in turn, can stimulate these sciences to new investigations to solve a big problem: why has Homo sapiens not found a proper niche among species, which means that he has not created an environment—friendly model of culture

Keywords:

• adaptation
• bioethics
• environmental life-quality
• evolution
• informational metabolism
• moral values
• neonaturalism
• soul
• Transcendental Subject
• vital values